Search: depreciation | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “depreciation”+ Section 148clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai981 Delhi723 Chennai375 Bangalore323 Kolkata168 Jaipur151 Ahmedabad120 Pune93 Hyderabad65 Raipur62 Indore52 Amritsar46 Lucknow41 Chandigarh37 Cochin31 Visakhapatnam26 Jodhpur20 Guwahati19 Surat18 Rajkot17 SC16 Nagpur12 Cuttack10 Karnataka9 Punjab & Haryana6 Kerala4 Panaji4 Patna4 Agra3 Calcutta3 Jabalpur2 Dehradun2 Ranchi2 Telangana1 Tripura1 Varanasi1 Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 14711 Section 1487 Section 143(2)6 Section 1445 Section 142(1)3 Section 143(3)3 Addition to Income3 Section 2502 Section 12A2

PUNRASAR JUTE PARK LIMITED,PURNEA vs. CIT, PURNEA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 432/PAT/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna05 Sept 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 142(2)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

depreciation allowance or any other allowance, as the case may be, for the assessment year concerned (hereafter in this section and in sections 148

ACIT vs. INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WELFARE HUMAN RESOURCES,

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed while the Cross Objection filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 119/PAT/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Oct 2024AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishra

For Appellant: Shri Abhi Sarkar, AdvFor Respondent: Ld. DR. Lalita Kumari, Sr. DR

Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250

depreciation allowance or any other allowance, as the case may be, for the assessment year concerned (hereafter in this section and in sections 148

ASHOK KUMAR,BHOJPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1, ARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed as indicated above

ITA 259/PAT/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Apr 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 148Section 40

148 (ASR.) (MAG.) on the ground that even if book results are rejected, Assessing Officer is duty 5 Assessment Year: 2010-2011 Ashok Kumar bound to make a fair and reasonable estimate of income based on evidence and material on record; he cannot make an addition in an arbitrary manner or on basis of personal vendetta. The Assessing Officer

MASUDAN TANTI,BHAGALPUR vs. CIT, NFAC, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 29/PAT/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna22 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri R. N. Bedi, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Lalita Kumari, Sr. DR

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 44

148 was issued and later order was passed u/s 147 r.w.s 144 read with section 144B of the Income Tax Act. Subsequently Appeal was filled and appeal was also rejected on the ground that documents and reply not submitted. Later, after so many request on 21.05.2024 the appellant had able to collect the ledger and Form 27D from BIHAR STATE