MINTU RANI,PATNA vs. ASSESSEMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. I.T.A. No.: 16/PAT/2025 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Mintu Rani. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal: “1. For that the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, ['the NFAC] erred on facts and in law in dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant, vide

ASHOK TIWARI,SIWAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 2 (3), SIWAN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthii.T.A. No. 28/Pat/2025 Assessment Year: 2012-2013 Ashok Tiwari,………………….……..……..………Appellant Nirala Nagar, Near Junior Sikshak Sangh, Behind Adda No. 1, Siwan, Bihar [Pan:Aecpt0627G] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,………………….…………...Respondent Ward-2(3), Siwan, Office At Income Tax Office, Dak Bunglow Road, Siwarn-841226, Bihar Appearances By: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Ashwani Kumar Singal, Jcit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: May 01, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: May 27, 2025 O R D E R

delay is condoned. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed his return of income on 21.06.2013. In this case, an information received from ADIT (Inv.), Muzaffarpur, that the assessee had purchased an immovable property at a total cost of Rs.58,30,786/- from Shri Abhishek Kumar. The said information examined from ITR of the assessee

JITENDRA KUMAR RAY,LALGANJ, HAJIPUR vs. ITO WARD 1(3) VAISHALI, HAJIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: or at the time of hearing of the Appeal. At the outset of hearing, we noted that the appeal filed by the assessee is delay by 256 days. In this regard, the assessee filed an affidavit dated 14.01.2026 stating the reasons for not filing appeal within the due date which is as under: “We enclose herewith an appeal u/s 253 of the I.T. Act 1961 against the order under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, relating to

unexplained investment u/s 69 r.w.s.115BBE of I. T. Act' 1961. which is arbitrary and unjustified. 6) For that the entire assessment order is bad both in law and facts of the case. 7) For that the demand made on account of interest u/s 234A, 234B, 234C and 234D is unsustainable in law being mechanical and without the sanction

INCOME TAX OFFICER, BHAGALPUR vs. SAPNA, NATHNAGAR, BHAGALPUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI SONJOY SARMA (Judicial Member)

condone the delay and the appeal is taking for adjudication. 4. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the as per the information available in ITBA system and insight portal of the income tax department in which it has been noted that the assessee had not filed the return of income

CHANDAN KUMAR,PATNA vs. NFAC, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthii.T.A. No. 260/Pat/2024 Assessment Year: 2015-2016 Chandan Kumar,……………..…………....……Appellant 2H/33, Near T.V. Tower, Bahadurpur, Housing Colony, Kankarbagh, Patna-800020, Bihar [Pan:Apups3760C] -Vs.- National Faceless Assessment Centre,....Respondent New Delhi Appearances By: N O N E, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, Jcit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: February 11, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: February 13, 2025 O R D E R

delay is condoned. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual, who filed his return of income declaring total income at Rs.11,46,000/-. In this case, the department has credible information that the assessee has made advances to various entities and made investments during F.Y. 2014-15 relevant to A.Y. 2015-16. In order

SUJEET KUMAR SINGH,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD 6(1), PATNA, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

delay is hereby condoned and this appeal is admitted for adjudication. 2. In this case, the appeal arises from order dated 08.03.2024 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereafter ‘the Ld. CIT(A)’], National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter ‘the Act’). In this case, the Ld. AO passed

MANOJ KUMAR DAS,BEGUSARAI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: 19/07/2025. The Appeal Is Delayed By Around 37 Days. 4. That The Assessee States That The Reason For Delay Is That The Assessee Is Suffering From Hiv Aids & Is Constantly Under Treatment. Copy Of Medical Treatment Is Enclosed.

delay is hereby condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 2. On the last date of hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee but it was decided to proceed ahead with the adjudication, with the help of Ld. DR. 2.1 This appeal arises from order u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter “the Act”), passed

VIJAY KUMAR JHA,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahui.T.A. Nos. 412, 413, 414 & 415/Pat/2025 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 14-15, 15-16 & 2016-17 Vijay Kumar Jha,…………….……………………..Appellant Kanhaulidih, Near Sanskrit College, Malighat, P.O. Ramna, P.S. Mithanpura, Muzaffarpur-842002, Bihar [Pan:Adgpj3007M] -Vs.- Assistant Commissioner/Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,………………………………………..Respondent Central Circle, Muzaffarpur, Aayakar Bhawan, New Nehru Stadium, Sikandarpur, Muzaffarpur-842001, Bihar Appearances By: Shri Anuj Ganguli, Ca, Appeared Filed On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Manab Adak, Jcit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: January 20, 2026 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: January 22, 2026 O R D E R

delay is condoned for all the appeals. 4. The facts in brief in ITA No. 412/PAT/2025 are that the assessee did not file ITR. Notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issued on 14.03.2019 after taking prior approval of ld. Pr. CIT, Muzaffarpur for AY 2013-14 as the assessee ITA Nos. 412 to 415/PAT/2025 (A.Ys

VIJAY KUMAR JHA,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahui.T.A. Nos. 412, 413, 414 & 415/Pat/2025 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 14-15, 15-16 & 2016-17 Vijay Kumar Jha,…………….……………………..Appellant Kanhaulidih, Near Sanskrit College, Malighat, P.O. Ramna, P.S. Mithanpura, Muzaffarpur-842002, Bihar [Pan:Adgpj3007M] -Vs.- Assistant Commissioner/Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,………………………………………..Respondent Central Circle, Muzaffarpur, Aayakar Bhawan, New Nehru Stadium, Sikandarpur, Muzaffarpur-842001, Bihar Appearances By: Shri Anuj Ganguli, Ca, Appeared Filed On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Manab Adak, Jcit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: January 20, 2026 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: January 22, 2026 O R D E R

delay is condoned for all the appeals. 4. The facts in brief in ITA No. 412/PAT/2025 are that the assessee did not file ITR. Notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issued on 14.03.2019 after taking prior approval of ld. Pr. CIT, Muzaffarpur for AY 2013-14 as the assessee ITA Nos. 412 to 415/PAT/2025 (A.Ys

VIJAY KUMAR JHA,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahui.T.A. Nos. 412, 413, 414 & 415/Pat/2025 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 14-15, 15-16 & 2016-17 Vijay Kumar Jha,…………….……………………..Appellant Kanhaulidih, Near Sanskrit College, Malighat, P.O. Ramna, P.S. Mithanpura, Muzaffarpur-842002, Bihar [Pan:Adgpj3007M] -Vs.- Assistant Commissioner/Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,………………………………………..Respondent Central Circle, Muzaffarpur, Aayakar Bhawan, New Nehru Stadium, Sikandarpur, Muzaffarpur-842001, Bihar Appearances By: Shri Anuj Ganguli, Ca, Appeared Filed On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Manab Adak, Jcit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: January 20, 2026 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: January 22, 2026 O R D E R

delay is condoned for all the appeals. 4. The facts in brief in ITA No. 412/PAT/2025 are that the assessee did not file ITR. Notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issued on 14.03.2019 after taking prior approval of ld. Pr. CIT, Muzaffarpur for AY 2013-14 as the assessee ITA Nos. 412 to 415/PAT/2025 (A.Ys

VIJAY KUMAR JHA,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahui.T.A. Nos. 412, 413, 414 & 415/Pat/2025 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 14-15, 15-16 & 2016-17 Vijay Kumar Jha,…………….……………………..Appellant Kanhaulidih, Near Sanskrit College, Malighat, P.O. Ramna, P.S. Mithanpura, Muzaffarpur-842002, Bihar [Pan:Adgpj3007M] -Vs.- Assistant Commissioner/Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,………………………………………..Respondent Central Circle, Muzaffarpur, Aayakar Bhawan, New Nehru Stadium, Sikandarpur, Muzaffarpur-842001, Bihar Appearances By: Shri Anuj Ganguli, Ca, Appeared Filed On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Manab Adak, Jcit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: January 20, 2026 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: January 22, 2026 O R D E R

delay is condoned for all the appeals. 4. The facts in brief in ITA No. 412/PAT/2025 are that the assessee did not file ITR. Notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issued on 14.03.2019 after taking prior approval of ld. Pr. CIT, Muzaffarpur for AY 2013-14 as the assessee ITA Nos. 412 to 415/PAT/2025 (A.Ys

RAKESH KUMAR SHARMA,PATNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

condone the delay in filing this appeal and the same is taken up for hearing. 3. The assessee in this appeal is aggrieved by the action of the ld. CIT(A) in dismissing the appeal of the assessee in limine for non deposit of advance tax. I.T.A. No.: 451/PAT/2024 Rakesh Kumar Sharma, AY : 2015-16 4. At the outset

JOHAR GADLY ALIAS ZOHAR MOHAMMAD BHAI THROUGH LEGAL HEIR RASHIDA GADLY,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishrai.T.A. No.295/Pat/2025 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Johar Gadly Alias Zohar Mohammad Bhai ……………....Appellant Shop No.5, Aditya Arcade, Exhibition Road, Patna, Bihar- 800001. [Pan: Abopb7542H] Vs. Acit, Cc-2, Patna………….…..……………..………………….…..... Respondent Appearances By: Shri Hiresh Karan, Adv. Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Manab Advak, Jcit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : January 13, 2026 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 15, 2026 आदेश / Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: The Present Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 31.01.2025 Passed By The Cit(A)-3, Patna U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The ‘Act’) For The Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Filed Return Of Income Declaring A Total Income Of ₹2,94,100. The Assessing Officer Completed Assessment U/S 143(3) By Determining Total Income At Rs.8,63,000/- After Making Addition Of Rs.11,57,190/- On Account Of Unexplained Investment U/S 69 Of The Act.

unexplained investment u/s 69 of the Act. I.T.A. No.295/Pat/2025 Johar Gadly Alias Zohar Mohammad Bhai 3. Aggrieved by the assessment order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A). However, the appeal was dismissed for non- prosecution, as the assessee failed to appear or effectively represent its case. 4. The assessee has now preferred an appeal before the Tribunal

NUTAN RAI,PATNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 5(3), PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm Nutan Rai H.No.1B, Jagdish Apartment, Income Tax Officer, Ward 5(3) Boring Canal Road, Patna- Patna, Bihar Vs. 800001, Bihar (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Ahtpr1244F Assessee By : Shri Manish Rastogi, Ar Revenue By : Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, Dr Date Of Hearing: 18.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 06.03.2026

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. Nutan Rai; A.Y. 2012-13 3. At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the issue involved in this case is the confirmation of addition of ₹55,57,500/- in respect of purchase of immovable property as unexplained investment

SRIRAM ENTERPRISES,PATNA vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. No. 76/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2018-2019 Sriram Enterprises,………………………..........Appellant C/O. Nirmal & Associates, Nepali Kothi, Opposite Gasoline Petrol Pump, Boring Road, Patna-800001 [Pan:Aarfs8853J] -Vs.- Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna,…………………………………..……………..Respondent, Bihar-800001 Appearances By: Shri Nishant Maitin, C.A., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Md. A.H. Chowdhary, Cit (D.R.), Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : 5Th March, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: May 8Th, 2024 O R D E R

condone the delay and proceed to decide the appeal on merit. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a partnership firm engaged in the business of Government Civil Contractor & Sub-contractor and involved in the infrastructure development and maintenance such as roads, bridges, railways tunnels, etc. Income of Rs.4,25,44,130/- declared

MADHU DEVI,NAWADA vs. ITO, WARD 2 (3), BIHARSHARIF, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal: “1. For that the proceeding initiated under section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act is bad and illegal in view of the fact that the assessing officer has no reason to believe within the meaning

LAL BABU PRASAD,SIWAN vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI SONJOY SARMA (Judicial Member)

delay of 437 days is condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 2 Lal Babu Prasad 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual engaged in the business of trading in gold and silver ornaments. He filed his return of income for the assessment year 2015–16. A survey under section 133A

DINESHWAR PRASAD,SARVADYA KAMLA APARTMENT, BORING ROAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, PATNA, NOT KNOWN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishrai.T.A. No.250/Pat/2025 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dineshwar Prasad.………………………. …………………....Appellant Sarvadya Kamla Apartment, An Path, North S K Puri, Boring Road, Patna - 800013. [Pan: Acwpp8473C] Vs. Dcit, Circle-4, Patna…..…..……………..………………….…..... Respondent Appearances By: Shri S.S.P Singh, Fca Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, Jcit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : August 18, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : September 1St, 2025 आदेश / Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 21.02.2023 Passed By The Nfac, Delhi Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961. 2. At The Outset, It Is Noted That There Is A Delay Of 749 Days In Filing The Present Appeal Before The Tribunal. The Assessee Has Filed A Condonation Petition Explaining The Reasons Or Such Delay. After Considering The Submissions & Materials On Record, We Are Satisfied That There Was Reasonable Cause For The Delay In Filing The Appeal. Accordingly, The Said Delay Is Condoned & The Appeal Is Admitted For Adjudication.

delay is condoned, and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. II.T.A. No.250/Pat/2025 Dineshwar Prasad 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual and derives income from salary and capital gain and other source and filed his return of income for the assessment year 2014-15 by declaring a total income of Rs.8,87,760/-. Subsequently

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA, PATNA vs. SMT. SIPRA GUPTA, PATNA

condone the delay and adjudicate the appeal.\nThe first issue raised by the Revenue is against the order of learned\nCIT (A) quashing the notice u/s 148 of the Act.\n3.1. The facts in brief are that the learned AO reopened the case u/s\n147 of the Act by issuing notice u/s 148 of the Act on 12.10.2017,\nafter obtaining