BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 86clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai425Mumbai346Kolkata272Delhi257Bangalore162Ahmedabad146Karnataka126Jaipur107Hyderabad96Pune87Chandigarh71Nagpur70Cuttack41Indore40Calcutta37Surat37Visakhapatnam29Lucknow24Kerala17Rajkot16Cochin12SC10Patna10Jodhpur9Amritsar9Guwahati9Panaji8Raipur7Allahabad4Telangana3Varanasi2Himachal Pradesh2Orissa1Agra1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Jabalpur1Rajasthan1Ranchi1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 25016Addition to Income7Section 69A6Section 11(1)6Condonation of Delay6Limitation/Time-bar5Section 1474Section 253(2)3Section 2(15)

RAJESH KUMAR,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD- 3 (2), GAYA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 171/PAT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna18 Sept 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115BSection 147Section 234ASection 250Section 271FSection 69A

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal: “1. For that the Ld. CIT(A)NFAC Delhi has erred in sustaining the order of the A.O. and thereby affirmed the order made by the A.O. amounting to Rs. 14,20,370/-. 2. For that

XAVIERS CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD,PATNA vs. ITO WARD- 2 (2), PATNA

3
Section 1443
Exemption3
Disallowance3

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 349/PAT/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna21 Mar 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthii.T.A. No. 349/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2015-2016 Xaviers Construction Pvt. Limited,....……Appellant House No. 239, Lodipur, Patna-800001, Bihar [Pan:Aaacx0342D] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,………………………….....Respondent Ward-2(2), Patna Appearances By: Shri Anjan Biswas, Fca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, Jcit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: February 13, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: March 21, 2025 O R D E R

Section 143(2)

delay is condoned. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant-assessee is a Private Limited Company, doing its business in developing Real Estate and engaged in civil contract work. The assessee has filed its return of income for the assessment year 2015-16 declaring total income of Rs.5,47,040/-. The case was selected for scrutiny. Accordingly

SHARDINDU PRASAD SINGH,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-6(4), PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 630/PAT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna15 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 144Section 147Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. I.T.A. No.: 630/PAT/2024 Assessment Year: 2016-17 Shardindu Prasad Singh. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal, which are argumentative: “A. For that, on the fact and circumstances of the case, this 2nd appeal arises against an arbitrary, baseless, hypothetical and presumptive incomplete

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 65/PAT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 253(2)

delay in filing of the appeals is hereby condoned and these three matters are admitted for adjudication. 1.1 This is a batch of three appeals having additions made on same issue for all the three years under consideration. Accordingly, these three matters are being disposed of by a single order. For the sake of convenience, the appeal

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 66/PAT/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 253(2)

delay in filing of the appeals is hereby condoned and these three matters are admitted for adjudication. 1.1 This is a batch of three appeals having additions made on same issue for all the three years under consideration. Accordingly, these three matters are being disposed of by a single order. For the sake of convenience, the appeal

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 67/PAT/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 253(2)

delay in filing of the appeals is hereby condoned and these three matters are admitted for adjudication. 1.1 This is a batch of three appeals having additions made on same issue for all the three years under consideration. Accordingly, these three matters are being disposed of by a single order. For the sake of convenience, the appeal

VIDYA SAGAR SINGH HUF THROUGH KARTA SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD- 6 (4), PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 8/PAT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna04 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 1Section 143(3)Section 220(2)Section 250Section 251Section 69A

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal: I.T.A. No.: 8/PAT/2025 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Vidya Sagar Singh HUF Through Karta Santosh Kumar Singh. “1. For that the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC has erred in deciding appeal ex-parte and confirming the addition

NILU KUMARI,SARAN vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TX DPTT., DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 429/PAT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115Section 115BSection 147Section 234ASection 250Section 69A

86,310/- 10. For that the invocation of section 115BBE and charging of tax at the rate of 60% in respect of the additions made is equally wrong, illegal and unjustified. 11. For that the appellant reserves to furnish detailed written submission along with evidences and documents on or before the date of hearing. 12. For that the appellant

SHARDA PRASAD,SIWAN vs. ITO, WARD- 2 (3), SIWAN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 199/PAT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp & Dr. Manish Borad, Am Sharda Prasad Ito, Ward 2(3), (Through Legal Heir Mr. Income Tax Officer, Dak Dharmesh Kumar Prasad) Bunglow Road, Naya Bazar, Galla Patti, Vs. Siwan-841226, Siwan-841226, Bihar Bihar (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aijpp2505Q Assessee By : Shri G.P. Tulsiyan, Ar Revenue By : Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, Dr Date Of Hearing: 10.09.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 24.09.2024

For Appellant: Shri G.P. Tulsiyan, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 69A

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication on merits. 04. At the outset, the learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that for unavoidable circumstances the assessee could not appear before the learned CIT (A), who has finally passed an ex-parte order placing reliance on the decision of Delhi Bench of ITAT in CIT VS. Multiplan India

BINOD KUMAR KEDIA,GOPALGANJ vs. ITO, WARD- 2 (4), SIWAN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 72/PAT/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna28 Jul 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) I.T.A. No. 72/Pat/2025 Assessment Year: 2013-2014 Binod Kumar Kedia,……………...…….…………Appellant S/O Latejeevan Ram Kedia, Marwari Mohalla, Gopalganj-841428, Bihar [Pan:Afhpk1798P] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,……………………………....Respondent Ward-2(4), Siwan Appearances By: Shri K.P. Jalan, C.A., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, Jcit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: May 22, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: July 28, 2025 O R D E R

Section 148Section 250Section 50C

86,000/- minus Rs.9,70,000/-) in his return of income, the ld. Assessing Officer issued a letter to the assessee on 04.06.2014. In compliance of the notice, the assessee failed to explain that why he has not shown the difference amount in his return of income. Notices under section 148 and 142(1) were issued by the ld. Assessing