PIONEER EDUCATION SOCIETY,HARYANA vs. ITO, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthii.T.A. No. 430/Pat/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-2018 Jaya Singh,………………………………….………Appellant 6-B/9, North Shrikrishnapuri, Patna-800013, Bihar [Pan:Bfxps2289J] -Vs.- Deputy Commissioner, Assistant Commissioner, Circle-1, Bhagalpur,………………………….....Respondent Bhagalpur, Bihar Appearances By: Shri Ranjeet Kr. Singh, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Rinku Singh, Cit (D.R.), Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue

delay is condoned. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual and proprietor of a petrol pump of Bharat Petroleum running in the name and style of M/s. Jaya Fuels situated at West Boring Canal Road, Patna. The assessee during the financial year 2016- 17 corresponding to assessment year 2017-18, derived income from

ANIL KUMAR SAH,BANKA vs. ITO, WD-1(4), BHAGALPUR, BHAGALPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) I.T.A. No. 324/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2015-2016 Anil Kumar Sah,………………………....….………Appellant Near Bari Durga Mandir, Kajreli Road, Amarpur, Dist. Banka-813101, Bihar [Pan:Aqgps8735A] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,………………………...…….Respondent Ward-1(4), Bhagalpur, Office Of The Income Tax Officer, R.N. Plaza, R B S S Road, Bhagalpur-812001, Bihar Appearances By: Shri Rakesh Kumar, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, Jcit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: June 16, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: August 29, 2025 O R D E R

delay is condoned. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual, who filed his return of income on 10.12.2015 showing total income of Rs.2.88,040/-. The assessee has shown his income from LIC commission, New India Insurance Company & interest income. The return was processed u/s 143(1) of the I.T Act. 1961. Later the case

PRABHAT KUMAR,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4, PATNA

Appeal is allowed\nfor statistical purposes

delay is\nhereby condoned and the matter is admitted for adjudication.\n2\nThis appeal emanates from the order dated 17.11.2023 passed by\nthe Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal\nCentre (NFAC), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)"] u/s 250\nof the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter ‘the Act').\n2.1 In this case

SHANKAR,PATNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- 6 (1), PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

condone the delay of 306 days and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal: “1. For that the grounds of appeal hereto are without prejudice to each other. 2. For that the order of the learned assessing officer and also the learned Commissioner of Income

MADHURI DEVI,SAHARSA vs. ITO WARD- 3 (4), SAHARSA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication on merits. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal: “1. For that, The Learned Assessing Officer, being ITO, Ward-3(4), Saharsa (Here in after called the "AO") has erred in Assessing the appellant on a total Income of Rs 7001665/- as against

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA, PATNA vs. SMT. SIPRA GUPTA, PATNA

85 days. At the time of hearing the counsel of\nthe assessee explained the reason for delay in filing the appeal. The\nLd. A.R did not raise any objection in condoning the delay. After\nhearing the rival contentions and perusing the materials available on\nrecord, we find that the delay is for bonafide and genuine reason,\nhence, we condone

SANJAY KUMAR ,PATNA vs. ITO WARD-4(5) PATNA , PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. ITA No.: 343/PAT/2025 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Sanjay Kumar. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal: “1. The Appellate order of the National Faceless Appeals Centre (NFAC)- Delhi. Is bad and erroneous both on facts and in law. 2. The order

JAN SIKSHAN SANSTHAN,BEGUSARAI vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), BHAGALPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes

condoning delay in such cases. The intention of legislature with\nrespect to such cases is very clear that the remedy in such situation lies in the\nsection 119 of the Act.\nFrom the above it is clear that the appellant has not correctly reported the application\nu/s 11(1). As has already been stated earlier the only remedy to correct

RANJEET KUMAR,MUZAFFARPUR vs. PR. CIT-1, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

condone the delay in filing the appeal and proceed to decide it on merit. 4. This appeal was filed in 2022. It is to be decided on priority being an appeal filed against the order passed under section 263. The President of ITAT way back in 2016 has issued guidelines for deciding these appeals on priority because their pendency would

SHARDA PRASAD,SIWAN vs. ITO, WARD- 2 (3), SIWAN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp & Dr. Manish Borad, Am Sharda Prasad Ito, Ward 2(3), (Through Legal Heir Mr. Income Tax Officer, Dak Dharmesh Kumar Prasad) Bunglow Road, Naya Bazar, Galla Patti, Vs. Siwan-841226, Siwan-841226, Bihar Bihar (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aijpp2505Q Assessee By : Shri G.P. Tulsiyan, Ar Revenue By : Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, Dr Date Of Hearing: 10.09.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 24.09.2024

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication on merits. 04. At the outset, the learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that for unavoidable circumstances the assessee could not appear before the learned CIT (A), who has finally passed an ex-parte order placing reliance on the decision of Delhi Bench of ITAT in CIT VS. Multiplan India