BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 282(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Amritsar69Mumbai62Jaipur52Delhi48Chennai46Pune46Panaji39Bangalore31Chandigarh29Kolkata29Hyderabad25Ahmedabad22Cochin14Indore13Lucknow10Rajkot10Raipur7Agra6Nagpur6Visakhapatnam6Jodhpur4Cuttack4Surat3SC2Allahabad2Patna2Varanasi1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 52

PAPPU KUMAR,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD- 5 (4), PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 322/PAT/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 249Section 253Section 3Section 5

1 Assessment Year: 2014-2015 Pappu Kumar 2. The Registry has pointed out that the appeal is time barred by 295 days. However, the assessee has filed an application for condonation of delay and contended that actually the appeal is time barred by 282 days. The assessee further contended that appeal was decided by the ld. CIT(Appeals) ex-parte

SATYA NARAYAN SINGH,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-6(2), PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 574/PAT/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna21 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri Sanjay Awasthiassessment Year: 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Alok Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, JCIT
Section 147Section 2(47)Section 250Section 50C

condone the delay and admit this appeal for adjudication. 2 Satya Narayan Singh, AY: 2015-16, 3. In this case, the ld. Assessing Officer is seemed to have passed an order u/s. 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Act. In this order, the Assessing Officer has assessed capital gains at Rs.1,34,97,643/-. Aggrieved with this case, the assessee approached