Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 282clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 52

PAPPU KUMAR,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD- 5 (4), PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 322/PAT/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 249Section 253Section 3Section 5

condonation of delay and contended that actually the appeal is time barred by 282 days. The assessee further contended that appeal was decided by the ld. CIT(Appeals) ex-parte immediately after the COVID period and no notice was issued to the assessee. The alleged notices mentioned in the impugned order were never served upon the assessee. Therefore, the assessee

SATYA NARAYAN SINGH,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-6(2), PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes