MAHANT PANDEY,ROHTAS vs. NFAC, DELHI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

24,984/- u/s 147 r.w.s 144 read with section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant preferred appeal. 3.1 In this case, the appellant has misrepresented the facts. Vide point no 2C of the form 35 submitted by the appellant, he has claimed date of service of order/notice of demand as 16.02.2024. Appellant filed the appeal

MAHANT PANDEY,ROHTAS vs. NFAC, DELHI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

24,984/- u/s 147 r.w.s 144 read with section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant preferred appeal. 3.1 In this case, the appellant has misrepresented the facts. Vide point no 2C of the form 35 submitted by the appellant, he has claimed date of service of order/notice of demand as 16.02.2024. Appellant filed the appeal

RAJESH KUMAR,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD- 3 (2), GAYA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal: “1. For that the Ld. CIT(A)NFAC Delhi has erred in sustaining the order of the A.O. and thereby affirmed the order made by the A.O. amounting to Rs. 14,20,370/-. 2. For that

SIDDHI GUPTA,AURANGABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 3 (3), AURANGABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthii.T.A. Nos. 355 & 356/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2017-2018 Siddhi Gupta,…………………..…………....……Appellant S/O. Gopal Prasad Gupta, Masjid Road, Near Rath, Durga Chowk, Obra, Aurangabad-824101, Bihar [Pan:Aufps5370G] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,…………………………....Respondent Ward-3(3), Aurangabad, Near Block More, Aurangabad-824101, Bihar

delay is condoned in both the appeals. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual, who earns income from trading of food grains. The assessee did not file his return of income for A.Y. 2017-18 and was supposed to file his return on due date. During the course of demonetization, the assessee deposited Rs.12

SIDDHI GUPTA,AURANGABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 3 (3), AURANGABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthii.T.A. Nos. 355 & 356/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2017-2018 Siddhi Gupta,…………………..…………....……Appellant S/O. Gopal Prasad Gupta, Masjid Road, Near Rath, Durga Chowk, Obra, Aurangabad-824101, Bihar [Pan:Aufps5370G] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,…………………………....Respondent Ward-3(3), Aurangabad, Near Block More, Aurangabad-824101, Bihar

delay is condoned in both the appeals. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual, who earns income from trading of food grains. The assessee did not file his return of income for A.Y. 2017-18 and was supposed to file his return on due date. During the course of demonetization, the assessee deposited Rs.12

CHINMASTIKA SIDHARTHA(JV),PATNA vs. CIT(A), PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz)

delay is condoned. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee derives income from contract work. The appellant-assessee is a joint venture of Chinamastika Construction and Developers Pvt. Limited (mentioned as 1st party) and Siddharth Construction & Trading Pvt. Ltd. (mentioned as 2nd party) The assessee filed its return of income on 19.01.2016 showing total income

BIHAR STATE EDUCATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORP. LTD,PATNA vs. ACIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE-1, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication on merits. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal: “1. For that the grounds of appeal hereto are without prejudice to each other. 2. For that the order of the ld. Assessing Officer as well as the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal

PIONEER EDUCATION SOCIETY,HARYANA vs. ITO, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthii.T.A. No. 430/Pat/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-2018 Jaya Singh,………………………………….………Appellant 6-B/9, North Shrikrishnapuri, Patna-800013, Bihar [Pan:Bfxps2289J] -Vs.- Deputy Commissioner, Assistant Commissioner, Circle-1, Bhagalpur,………………………….....Respondent Bhagalpur, Bihar Appearances By: Shri Ranjeet Kr. Singh, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Rinku Singh, Cit (D.R.), Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue

24, 2025 Date of pronouncing the order: April 29, 2025 O R D E R Per Duvvuru RL Reddy, Vice-President (KZ):- The present appeal is directed at the instance of assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 19th March, 2024 passed for Assessment Year 2017-18. 1 Jaya

JAYA SINGH,PATNA vs. DC,AC CIRCLE-1, BHAGALPUR, BHAGALPUR, BIHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthii.T.A. No. 430/Pat/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-2018 Jaya Singh,………………………………….………Appellant 6-B/9, North Shrikrishnapuri, Patna-800013, Bihar [Pan:Bfxps2289J] -Vs.- Deputy Commissioner, Assistant Commissioner, Circle-1, Bhagalpur,………………………….....Respondent Bhagalpur, Bihar Appearances By: Shri Ranjeet Kr. Singh, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Rinku Singh, Cit (D.R.), Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue

24, 2025 Date of pronouncing the order: April 29, 2025 O R D E R Per Duvvuru RL Reddy, Vice-President (KZ):- The present appeal is directed at the instance of assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 19th March, 2024 passed for Assessment Year 2017-18. 1 Jaya

PAWAN KUMAR, PROP. LIFE LINE RICE MILLS ,BEGUSARAI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1), , BEGUSARAI

In the result, these two appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purposes

condonation of the said delay.\n2.0 The present appeals arise from the order u/s 250 of the Income Tax\nAct, 1961 (hereafter ‘the Act’) passed by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax\n(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereafter ‘the\nLd. CIT(A)] dated 29.12.2021 (AY 2012-13) and 19.12.2021 (AY 2013-14).\n2.1 Aggrieved with the action

RAJESH SINGH,HAJIPUR vs. ADDL/JCIT, DELHI, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz)

24, 2025 Date of pronouncing the order: July 28, 2025 O R D E R The present appeal is directed at the instance of assessee against the order of ld. Additional/ Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Delhi dated 3rd January 2024 passed for Assessment Year 2016-17. 1 Rajesh Singh 2. The appeal is time barred

MINTU RANI,PATNA vs. ASSESSEMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

24-09-2024. 2. For that the NFAC erred in confirming the assessment order passed by the Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, (the AO'), assessing the appellant under section 147 read with section 144 of the Act, vide order dated 20-03-2024 at an income of Rs 1,15,11,871/- against the returned income

SHARDINDU PRASAD SINGH,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-6(4), PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. I.T.A. No.: 630/PAT/2024 Assessment Year: 2016-17 Shardindu Prasad Singh. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal, which are argumentative: “A. For that, on the fact and circumstances of the case, this 2nd appeal arises against an arbitrary, baseless, hypothetical and presumptive incomplete

RAMESH PRASAD GUPTA,PATNA vs. ITO WARD 5(1), PATNA, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) I.T.A. No. 393/Pat/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-2018 Ramesh Prasad Gupta,……………….……..……Appellant 1, Bengali Road, Mithapur B Area, Patna-800001, Bihar [Pan:Acvpg5869L] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,……………………….……...Respondent Ward-5(1), Patna, Bihar Appearances By: Shri Nishant Maitin, C.A., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, Jcit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: March 10, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: March 17, 2025 O R D E R

delay is condoned. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual, who is engaged in the business of trading of food grains in the name and style of M/s. Maa Ambey Traders. The assessee furnished his return of income on 07.11.2017 for the relevant assessment year declaring income of Rs.5,99,987/- alongwith tax audit

MANI BHUSHAN KUMAR,PATNA vs. CIT, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

24-July-2025 ORDER PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as Ld. 'CIT(A)'] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for AY 2012-13 dated 16.07.2024, which has been passed

PAWAN KUMAR, PROP. LIFE LINE RICE MILLS ,BEGUSARAI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1), , BEGUSARAI

In the result, these two appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purposes

condonation of the said delay.\n2.0 The present appeals arise from the order u/s 250 of the Income Tax\nAct, 1961 (hereafter ‘the Act’) passed by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax\n(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereafter ‘the\nLd. CIT(A)] dated 29.12.2021 (AY 2012-13) and 19.12.2021 (AY 2013-14).\n2.1 Aggrieved with the action

DEEPAK SHRAWAN BUDHIA,MUMBAI vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF I.T., PATNA-1, PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI SONJOY SARMA (Judicial Member)

condone the delay and taking up for adjudication. 4. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the Ld. Pr.CIT called the assessment record and observed that order passed by the AO u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144B of the Act was completed on 19.03.2023 assessed the total income at Rs. 68,24,861/- in which he observed

NEXGENHUMAN,PATNA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

delay is hereby condoned. 3. Brief facts of the case of the assessee is that the assessee is a trust established on 20.03.2018 to carry out charitable activities in the field of education, medical relief to the poor and other in its objects. An application in Form 10AB was filed for grant of regular registration under sub-clause