BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 234clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi205Mumbai140Chennai130Karnataka122Bangalore119Jaipur52Pune52Ahmedabad50Kolkata40Hyderabad35Cochin31Cuttack25Surat19Chandigarh17Indore9Nagpur9Amritsar8Visakhapatnam8Guwahati6Jodhpur3Patna3Rajkot3SC3Telangana3Ranchi2Raipur2Panaji2Calcutta2Orissa2Lucknow1Jabalpur1Himachal Pradesh1Agra1Rajasthan1Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 2503Addition to Income3Section 143(3)2

PATNA SMART CITY LIMITED,PATNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PTN-W-(21)(91), PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the appellant is dismissed

ITA 314/PAT/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Patna18 Nov 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 2(45)Section 234BSection 250

234 C the Act. 10. For that in any view of the matter the order of the learned assessing officer making additions in the manner aforesaid without proper consideration is bad in law and is merit to be set aside. 11. For that other various reasons which may be as under time of hearing” 3. Brief facts of the case

JITENDRA SINGH,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 172/PAT/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Patna
06 Sept 2022
AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 127Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 234Section 250Section 68

section 234-B & 234-C and in charging the interests there under at Rs. 71,714/- and Rs. 8,041/- respectively. 6. For that the humble appellant craves for the leave of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals) to take, raise, press plead and/or argue any other ground or grounds as may be necessary hereinafter.” 2. At the outset

RAVI LOCHAN SINGH,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-5, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 124/PAT/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 Jan 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 250Section 32Section 32(1)

delay is hereby condoned and the matter is admitted for adjudication. 2. It is noticed that this is an appeal filed on 31.12.2020 and has gone through 10 days of hearing beginning from 02.11.2022 to the last one being on 01.01.2025. It is seen that either adjournments have been taken by the Ld. AR or none have attended on certain