LAXMAN SHARMA,PATNA vs. ITO WARD4(5), PATNA

In the result, these two appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

206 days. The assessee has filed petition for condonation of delay which are similarly worded. For the sake of convenience, the condonation of delay petition filed for ITA No. 336/Pat/2024 is extracted as under: I.T.A. Nos. 336 & 337/Pat/2024 Laxman Sharma “1. That, the CIT Appeal had passed order on 01.01.2024 under section

LAXMAN SHARMA,PATNA vs. NFAC, DELHI

In the result, these two appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

206 days. The assessee has filed petition for condonation of delay which are similarly worded. For the sake of convenience, the condonation of delay petition filed for ITA No. 336/Pat/2024 is extracted as under: I.T.A. Nos. 336 & 337/Pat/2024 Laxman Sharma “1. That, the CIT Appeal had passed order on 01.01.2024 under section

JCIT(IN-SITU), CIRCLE-1, PATNA, PATNA vs. TECHNOCULTURE BUILDING CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

206 days, for which an application has been filed as under: “We, Technoculture Building Centre Private Limited hereby submit this application seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal against the order of CIT(A) order u/s 250 dated 12/12/2024 for A.Y 2020-21 There is delay of 20 days in filing this appeal occurred due to the time taken

M/S MANISH FINLEASE (P) LTD,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), PATNA

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2010-2011 Manish Finlease Pvt Ltd., Vs. Ito, Ward 2(1), Patna Chandi House Exhibition Road, Patna Pan/Gir No.Aaccm 6252 B (Appellant) .. ( Respondent) Assessee By : Shri A.K.Rastogi & Rakesh Kumar, Ars Revenue By : Shri Indrajeet Singh, Dr Date Of Hearing : 20/06/ 2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 09/08/ 2019 O R D E R Per Bench This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Cit(A)-1, Patna Dated 27.9.2018 For The Assessment Year 2010-2011. 2. The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Delayed By 51 Days. The Assessee Has Filed Application For Condonation Of Delay Stating The Reasons For Not Filing The Appeal In Time Before The Tribunal. After Hearing The Submissions Of The Parties, We Are Satisfied That The Assessee Had A Bonafide Reason For Not Filing The Appeal In Time. Therefore, We Condone The Delay & Proceed To Decide The Appeal Of The Assessee On Merits.

condone the delay and proceed to decide the appeal of the assessee on merits. P a g e 1 | 71 Assessment Year : 2010 -2011 3. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal” “1. For that the CIT(A) has erred in affirming the order of the Assessing Officer passed u/s.143(3)/147 wherein the Assessing Officer has assessed