BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 206clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai169Karnataka123Pune119Kolkata77Mumbai76Delhi68Raipur62Chandigarh59Ahmedabad57Nagpur54Bangalore38Calcutta35Surat28Jaipur27Hyderabad23Rajkot12Indore7Guwahati7Agra5Patna5Varanasi5Cuttack3Dehradun3Amritsar3Lucknow2Panaji2Visakhapatnam2SC2Andhra Pradesh1Cochin1Allahabad1Jodhpur1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 142(1)5Section 2505Addition to Income5Limitation/Time-bar5Section 143(3)4Deduction3Condonation of Delay3Section 143(2)2Section 133(6)

SIDDHI GUPTA,AURANGABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 3 (3), AURANGABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 356/PAT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna13 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthii.T.A. Nos. 355 & 356/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2017-2018 Siddhi Gupta,…………………..…………....……Appellant S/O. Gopal Prasad Gupta, Masjid Road, Near Rath, Durga Chowk, Obra, Aurangabad-824101, Bihar [Pan:Aufps5370G] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,…………………………....Respondent Ward-3(3), Aurangabad, Near Block More, Aurangabad-824101, Bihar

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

206 days respectively in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. Therefore, he pleaded to condone the delay in both the appeals. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we are inclined to condone the delay in both the appeals since the delay is not due to negligence on the part of assessee and the assessee has established sufficient

2
Cash Deposit2
Demonetization2
Business Income2

SIDDHI GUPTA,AURANGABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 3 (3), AURANGABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 355/PAT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna13 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthii.T.A. Nos. 355 & 356/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2017-2018 Siddhi Gupta,…………………..…………....……Appellant S/O. Gopal Prasad Gupta, Masjid Road, Near Rath, Durga Chowk, Obra, Aurangabad-824101, Bihar [Pan:Aufps5370G] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,…………………………....Respondent Ward-3(3), Aurangabad, Near Block More, Aurangabad-824101, Bihar

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

206 days respectively in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. Therefore, he pleaded to condone the delay in both the appeals. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we are inclined to condone the delay in both the appeals since the delay is not due to negligence on the part of assessee and the assessee has established sufficient

LAXMAN SHARMA,PATNA vs. ITO WARD4(5), PATNA

In the result, these two appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 336/PAT/2024[2017--18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna23 Dec 2024
Section 143(3)Section 250

206 days. The assessee has filed petition for condonation of delay which are similarly worded. For the sake of convenience, the condonation of delay petition filed for ITA No. 336/Pat/2024 is extracted as under: I.T.A. Nos. 336 & 337/Pat/2024 Laxman Sharma “1. That, the CIT Appeal had passed order on 01.01.2024 under section

LAXMAN SHARMA,PATNA vs. NFAC, DELHI

In the result, these two appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 337/PAT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna23 Dec 2024AY 2018-19
Section 143(3)Section 250

206 days. The assessee has filed petition for condonation of delay which are similarly worded. For the sake of convenience, the condonation of delay petition filed for ITA No. 336/Pat/2024 is extracted as under: I.T.A. Nos. 336 & 337/Pat/2024 Laxman Sharma “1. That, the CIT Appeal had passed order on 01.01.2024 under section

JCIT(IN-SITU), CIRCLE-1, PATNA, PATNA vs. TECHNOCULTURE BUILDING CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes\nand Cross Objection filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 41/PAT/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Patna03 Jun 2025AY 2020-21
Section 142(1)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)

206 days, for\nwhich an application has been filed as under:\n\n“We, Technoculture Building Centre Private Limited hereby submit this application\nseeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal against the order of CIT(A) order u/s\n250 dated 12/12/2024 for A.Y 2020-21\n\nThere is delay of 20 days in filing this appeal occurred