BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

466 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 200A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna466Pune125Chennai106Delhi78Nagpur41Visakhapatnam29Bangalore24Cochin23Dehradun19Surat19Hyderabad16Mumbai14Jaipur12Panaji10Kolkata7Amritsar6Raipur6Rajkot5Indore5Agra4Chandigarh3Lucknow3Guwahati2Jabalpur1Jodhpur1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

TDS100

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,PARARIYA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 310/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,A P COLONY GAYA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 320/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

Showing 1–20 of 466 · Page 1 of 24

...

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,MANGRAON BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 261/PAT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,PUSAULI STATION BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 281/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,UPHARA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 313/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,A P COLONY GAYA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 319/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,BARE BHABUA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 193/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,KOCHAS BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 260/PAT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,PUSAULI STATION BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 279/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,PUSAULI STATION BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 280/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,PARARIYA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 311/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,PARARIYA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 312/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,A P COLONY GAYA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 317/PAT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,A P COLONY GAYA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 318/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DUMRAON BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 191/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DUMRAON BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 192/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DARIGAON BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 246/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DARIGAON BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 247/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,MURADABAD BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 267/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,KURWA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 335/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly