AASHIRBAD ENTERPRISES,FORBESGANJ vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PURNEA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 147 of the Act. 4. Aggrieved with the assessment order the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). It was submitted that the income tax return of the firm was audited by the Chartered Accountant well within the prescribed time and filed on 04.11.2017 and a refund of Rs. 14,750/- was granted. In the case

BLUECHIP ASSET PRIVATE LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS BLUECHIP ADVISORY PVT. LTD,PATNA vs. CIT(A), NFAC, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

delay filling of appeal that one of the director "Shanti Devi (DIN-01935923) was ill from last year. Due to illness of the director, we have not proper reply to CIT(A) also. And they have passed order accordingly as we have not reply on time to CIT(A). 5. That the, The Director (Shanti Devi (DIN-01935923) has passed

M/S MANISH FINLEASE (P) LTD,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), PATNA

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2010-2011 Manish Finlease Pvt Ltd., Vs. Ito, Ward 2(1), Patna Chandi House Exhibition Road, Patna Pan/Gir No.Aaccm 6252 B (Appellant) .. ( Respondent) Assessee By : Shri A.K.Rastogi & Rakesh Kumar, Ars Revenue By : Shri Indrajeet Singh, Dr Date Of Hearing : 20/06/ 2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 09/08/ 2019 O R D E R Per Bench This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Cit(A)-1, Patna Dated 27.9.2018 For The Assessment Year 2010-2011. 2. The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Delayed By 51 Days. The Assessee Has Filed Application For Condonation Of Delay Stating The Reasons For Not Filing The Appeal In Time Before The Tribunal. After Hearing The Submissions Of The Parties, We Are Satisfied That The Assessee Had A Bonafide Reason For Not Filing The Appeal In Time. Therefore, We Condone The Delay & Proceed To Decide The Appeal Of The Assessee On Merits.

condone the delay and proceed to decide the appeal of the assessee on merits. P a g e 1 | 71 Assessment Year : 2010 -2011 3. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal” “1. For that the CIT(A) has erred in affirming the order of the Assessing Officer passed u/s.143(3)/147 wherein the Assessing Officer has assessed

AMRESH KUMAR,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, PATNA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sri Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma

condone the delay. 5. For that Learned Assessing Officer has attached the business bank account of appellant. That hamper the business goodwill and credibility of the appellant in the market and company. Page 2 of 7 I.T.A. No.: 197/Pat/2019 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Amresh Kumar. 6. That the appellant craves the leave of the appellate Jurisdiction to add, alter

MOHAMMAD KASIF RAJA,MILIK TOLA, KHOKSA, BAISI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(1), PURNEA, PURNEA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal: “1. That the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC dated 28.03.2024 is bad in law and against the principles of natural justice. 2. That the appellant was not provided a proper and reasonable opportunity

MOTOR MACHINERUY TOOLS,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-5, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice-(Kz)]

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’). 2. It is noted that there is a delay of 49 days on the part of the assessee in filing this appeal before the Tribunal. In this regard, the assessee has moved an application seeking condonation of the said delay on the ground that the appeal could

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,KURWA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,PATNER BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,CHAKAI BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,BALGUDAR BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,KHATANGI (KURTHA) BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing