PRABHAT KUMAR,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4, PATNA

Appeal is allowed\nfor statistical purposes

delay is\nhereby condoned and the matter is admitted for adjudication.\n2\nThis appeal emanates from the order dated 17.11.2023 passed by\nthe Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal\nCentre (NFAC), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)"] u/s 250\nof the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter ‘the Act').\n2.1 In this case

AASHIRBAD ENTERPRISES,FORBESGANJ vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PURNEA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 147 of the Act. 4. Aggrieved with the assessment order the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). It was submitted that the income tax return of the firm was audited by the Chartered Accountant well within the prescribed time and filed on 04.11.2017 and a refund of Rs. 14,750/- was granted. In the case

BLUECHIP ASSET PRIVATE LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS BLUECHIP ADVISORY PVT. LTD,PATNA vs. CIT(A), NFAC, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

delay filling of appeal that one of the director "Shanti Devi (DIN-01935923) was ill from last year. Due to illness of the director, we have not proper reply to CIT(A) also. And they have passed order accordingly as we have not reply on time to CIT(A). 5. That the, The Director (Shanti Devi (DIN-01935923) has passed

AMIT KUMAR,VAISHALI vs. ITO, WARD- 1 (3), VAISHALI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

condoned the delay. Considering the assessee's business in the unorganized sector and the agreement with the DR, the Tribunal decided to estimate profit at 8% on the total turnover under Section 44AD of the Act.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961", "44AD of the Act" ], "issues": "Whether the addition of Rs. 8,06,200

MOHAMMAD KASIF RAJA,MILIK TOLA, KHOKSA, BAISI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(1), PURNEA, PURNEA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal: “1. That the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC dated 28.03.2024 is bad in law and against the principles of natural justice. 2. That the appellant was not provided a proper and reasonable opportunity

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,KHATANGI (KURTHA) BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,KHATANGI (KURTHA) BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,KURWA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,BALGUDAR BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,MANANPUR BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,KHATANGI (KURTHA) BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,BALGUDAR BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return for the relevant quarter u/s 200A of the Act. Since, there was delay in filing