Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 194Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Kolkata32 Mumbai29 Chennai24 Delhi23 Hyderabad5 Bangalore4 Patna4 Lucknow3 Visakhapatnam2 Allahabad2 Indore2 Jaipur2 Rajkot2 Surat2 Varanasi2 Ahmedabad2 Amritsar1 Raipur1 Karnataka1 Jabalpur1 Cochin1 Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 2505 Section 1444 Limitation/Time-bar4 Section 1473 Section 403 Addition to Income3 Condonation of Delay3 Section 271(1)(c)2 Section 194J

ANIL KUMAR,WEST CHAMPARAN vs. ITO, WARD- 1 (5), BETTIAH

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 261/PAT/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna13 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 144Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

condone the delay and admit both the appeals for adjudication. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal: I. ITA No. 261/PAT/2025: “1. For that the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, [the NFAC] erred on facts and in law in partly allowing the appeal filed by the assessee, vide order passed under section

ANIL KUMAR,WEST CHAMPARAN vs. ITO, WARD- 1 (5), BETTIAH

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ANIL KUMAR,WEST CHAMPARAN vs. ITO, WARD- 1 (5), BETTIAH

ANIL KUMAR,WEST CHAMPARAN vs. ITO, WARD- 1 (5), BETTIAH

ANIL KUMAR,WEST CHAMPARAN vs. ITO, WARD- 1 (5), BETTIAH

ANIL KUMAR,WEST CHAMPARAN vs. ITO, WARD- 1 (5), BETTIAH

RAVI LOCHAN SINGH,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-5, PATNA

ANIL KUMAR,NALANDA vs. ITO, WARD- 2 (3), BIHARSHARIF