OOSMANIA TRUST,MUZAFFARPUR vs. CIT (E), PATNA, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

section 12A(1)(ac) the delay in filing the application for renewal of registration may please be condoned and issue may be remanded to the desk of the CIT(E) to consider the application of the assessee in accordance with law. Further now the assessee Trust has already made an addendum to the trust deed incorporating the dissolution clause, copy

ACIT, PATNA vs. NEW ERA SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT WELFARE SOCIETY, PATNA

Appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

2. Before us, right at the outset, the Ld. DR pointed out the provisions of section 13(10) of the Act and used that to support the action of Ld. AO. The Ld. AR on the other hand stated that the Form 10B could not be filed due to ignorance of Rules and procedures and the same was prepared

KARAM AGRAMI AMAN AUR MAITRI SANSTAN,RANCHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA, PATNA

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Patna For Rejection Of Registration Under Section 12Ab(1)(B)(Iii) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The Said Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Patna Was Passed & Received On The Same Date By Mail. Therefore, The Appeal Should Have Been Instituted Within 60 Days From Receipt Of Such Order I.E., On Or Before 04.05.2024. I.T.A. No. 505/Pat/2024 Karam Agrami Aman Aur Maitri Sanstan

delay is hereby condoned and this appeal is admitted for adjudication. 2. The present appeal emanates from order dated 02.03.2024, passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Patna, [hereafter ‘the Ld. CIT(E)’], u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter ‘the Act’). 2.1 In this case, the assessee had filed an application

ROSE BUD MUSLIM EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,PATNA vs. ITO, EXEMPTION, WARD-1, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

delay is, therefore, condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 2. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as under:- 1. For that the grounds of appeal hereto are without prejudice to each other. 2. For that the order of the learned assessing officer and also the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) is bad both

NEXGENHUMAN,PATNA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

2. It appears from the report of the registry that the appeal has been filed after a delay of 116 days for this the assessee has filed condonation petition. On perusal of the condonation petition, the reason for delay in filing the appeal seems to be genuine and bonafide. The Ld. D.R did not raise any objection in condoning

GURUDWARA BAL LEELA MANINI SANGAL TRUST,PATNA vs. DCIT, CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 10/Pat/2022 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Gurudwara Bal Leela Manini Sangat Trust National Faceless Appeal Patna Sahib Vs Centre, Delhi Patna City Patna - 800008 [Pan: Aabtg9954E] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri D.V. Pathy, Advocate & Shri Hiresh Karana, Advocate Revenue By : Md. A.H. Chowdhary, Cit D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 05/03/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 21/03/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per, Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 29/12/2021, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. Though The Assessee Has Raised Eight Grounds Of Appeal But The Grievance Are Two Fold:- (I) The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Dismissing The Appeal In Limine For Delay Of 1423 Days In Filing Of The Appeal Ignoring The Fact That The Delay Occurred Due To Fault Of The Counsel, Who Had Bona Fide Belief That The Impugned Order Is Rectifiable.

Section 154 of the Act. 7. That I admit that the delay in filing the appeal primarily arose due to a wrong decision of mine and was indeed my fault. I was apologetic for the delay in filing the appeal which was caused due to my fault as a counsel and that my clients who are charitable trust where

ALMAHAD TRUST ,PATNA vs. ITO EXEMPTION, WARD-1, PATNA , PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI SONJOY SARMA (Judicial Member)

condone the delay and the appeal is taking for adjudication. 5. Briefly stated that facts of the case are that as per e-filing portal the assessee has deposited cash of Rs. 21,84,076/- in A/c No. 032404010003154 to J & K Bank based on the information. A notice u/s 148 of the Act was issued to the assessee

SHASHI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL AVAM WELFARE SOCIETY,PATNA vs. AO, PATNA

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

12A and had furnished the Audit Report in Form 10B before completion of assessment. 3. That the Learned CIT(A) failed to appreciate that delay in filing Form 10B is a procedural/technical lapse and the same stands condonable in view of various CBDT Circulars and judicial pronouncements (including CIT v. Xavier's Kelavam Mandal Pvt. Ltd. [Taxmann], Trustees of Tulsidas