BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 12A(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune255Mumbai213Delhi181Jaipur127Ahmedabad127Bangalore122Kolkata110Chennai95Hyderabad85Lucknow44Indore37Calcutta37Chandigarh34Cuttack34Surat32Nagpur24Rajkot19Amritsar18Karnataka16Visakhapatnam12Jodhpur12Raipur11Panaji10Patna9Cochin7Agra6Allahabad6Guwahati4Jabalpur2Ranchi2Varanasi2SC1Dehradun1Telangana1Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 12A22Section 1115Section 12A(1)(ac)8Exemption8Section 143(1)7Section 2505Section 1445Section 12A(1)(b)4Condonation of Delay4

RAJBANSHI LOK KALYAN TRUST,SIWAN vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 131/PAT/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Patna22 Oct 2025AY 2025-26
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

delay in filing the\nappeal is hereby condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication\non merits.\n3. Brief Facts of the Case are that the assessee filed an application\nin Form No. 10AB seeking regular registration under clause (iii) of sub-\nsection (1)(ac) of Section 12A, read with Section 12AB(1)(b

OOSMANIA TRUST,MUZAFFARPUR vs. CIT (E), PATNA, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 519/PAT/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Feb 2026AY 2025-26

Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 119(2)(b)3
Limitation/Time-bar3
Charitable Trust2
Bench:
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

b) of the Act was rejected and the provisional registration granted u/s ITA No.: 519/PAT/2025 Assessment Year: 2025-26 Oosmania Trust. 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Act in Form No. 10AC dated 08.04.2022 for AY 2022-23 to AY 2023-24 was also cancelled. 4. Aggrieved with the order of the Ld. CIT (Exemption), the assessee has filed

ACIT, PATNA vs. NEW ERA SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT WELFARE SOCIETY, PATNA

Appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 296/PAT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna04 Feb 2025AY 2017-18
Section 10Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(b)Section 139(1)Section 144Section 2Section 250Section 288

1) of section 12A, its income chargeable to tax shall be computed after allowing deduction for the expenditure (other than capital expenditure) incurred in India, for the objects of the trust or institution, subject to fulfilment of the following conditions, namely:— (a) such expenditure is not from the corpus standing to the credit of the trust or institution

SARVAJANIK EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCIETY,GUGULDIH vs. COMMISSIONER OF IMCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 44/PAT/2025[Na-N]Status: DisposedITAT Patna09 Dec 2025

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

12A may be kindly directed to be allowed to the Appellant by condoning the delay. 2.2. Personal hearing may be granted. 2.3. Any other relief that your honors may deem fit may be granted.” 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Society in Jamui, Bihar and had applied for registration u/s 12AB

SHASHI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL AVAM WELFARE SOCIETY,PATNA vs. AO, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 428/PAT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna29 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(b)Section 143(1)Section 250

b) of the Act. In the present case,\nthere is no evidence on record that the appellant filed any such condonation\npetition before the Commissioner. CPC was therefore justified in disallowing\nthe exemption u/s 11 as claimed in return. This authority has no jurisdiction\nto condone the delay in filing Form 10B.\n\n5.3 As regard appellant's appeal against

PARTH SARTHI BALY SHILPI EDUCATIONAL TRUST,VAISHALI, HAJIPUR vs. CPC, BENGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 556/PAT/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Patna20 Mar 2025AY 2020-21
Section 11Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 250

1. That the issue in this appeal relates to disallowance of exemption u/s 12A on\nthe ground that there was delay in filing of form-10B.\n2. That CBDT has issued a circular bearing no-16/2024 dated-18/11/2024,\naccording to which the delay in filing of audit report in form-10B can be condoned.\n3. That the appellant

KARAM AGRAMI AMAN AUR MAITRI SANSTAN,RANCHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA, PATNA

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 505/PAT/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Patna13 Feb 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Hon’Ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Patna For Rejection Of Registration Under Section 12Ab(1)(B)(Iii) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The Said Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Patna Was Passed & Received On The Same Date By Mail. Therefore, The Appeal Should Have Been Instituted Within 60 Days From Receipt Of Such Order I.E., On Or Before 04.05.2024. I.T.A. No. 505/Pat/2024 Karam Agrami Aman Aur Maitri Sanstan

Section 12(1)(ac)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

delay is hereby condoned and this appeal is admitted for adjudication. 2. The present appeal emanates from order dated 02.03.2024, passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Patna, [hereafter ‘the Ld. CIT(E)’], u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter ‘the Act’). 2.1 In this case, the assessee had filed an application

KANHAIYA KUMAR,NAWADA vs. ITO, WARD-2(5), BIHARSHARIF

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 560/PAT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna13 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A. No.560/Pat/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18

Section 143(3)Section 144Section 250

12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and provisos (b) and (c) of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and any other laws, which prescribe period(s) of limitation for instituting proceedings, outer limits (within which the court or tribunal can condone delay) and termination of proceedings. [Order dated 10.01.2022) In light of the aforesaid declaration

JAN SIKSHAN SANSTHAN,BEGUSARAI vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), BHAGALPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 279/PAT/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Patna09 Jan 2025AY 2022-23
Section 11(1)Section 119Section 119(2)(b)Section 143(1)Section 250

condoning delay in such cases. The intention of legislature with\nrespect to such cases is very clear that the remedy in such situation lies in the\nsection 119 of the Act.\nFrom the above it is clear that the appellant has not correctly reported the application\nu/s 11(1). As has already been stated earlier the only remedy to correct