BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 127clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai136Karnataka123Delhi113Chennai93Kolkata66Jaipur64Chandigarh58Bangalore57Hyderabad49Calcutta41Ahmedabad41Lucknow26Pune22Visakhapatnam19Amritsar19Cochin18Surat18Raipur16Indore15Rajkot15Nagpur9Guwahati6Agra5Ranchi5SC5Telangana5Cuttack4Kerala4Jodhpur3Patna3Dehradun3Allahabad3Jabalpur2Varanasi2Orissa2Andhra Pradesh1Gauhati1Rajasthan1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 2506Section 1443Section 143(3)3Addition to Income3Section 143(2)2Natural Justice2Condonation of Delay2

THE SAMASTIPUR DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,SAMASTIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DARBHANGA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 508/PAT/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna04 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) provided various opportunities to the assessee as per para 4 of his order, 7 times opportunities were provided but the assessee did not respond any of the notices. Thereafter, the Ld. CIT(A) after relying on various judgments decided the issue on 10.12.2022 on the basis of material available on record and upheld the order of the AO. 4. Aggrieved from the above order, the assessee filed appeal before the

For Respondent: Sh. Manab Adak, JCIT
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250

Section 3 of the Limitation Act; (v) Courts are empowered to exercise discretion to condone the delay if sufficient cause had been explained, but that exercise of power is discretionary in nature and may not be exercised even if sufficient cause is established for various factors such as, where there is inordinate delay, negligence and want of due diligence

SHREE RANI SATI TEXTILES,MUZAFFARPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CIR-2, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 701/PAT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna07 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 253(5)

127 days for which an application as per Section 253(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been filed along-with memorandum of appeal. 07. That delay in filing the appeal is because of electronic service of order for which no intimation/alert message was received by the deponent that could have enabled him and also his poor health owing

JITENDRA SINGH,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 172/PAT/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Patna06 Sept 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 127Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 234Section 250Section 68

127 of the Act and the new AO has failed to serve any notice u/s 143(2) of the Act. 4. For that the ld. assessing officer has erred in law in making the addition of Rs. 6,91,050/- as unexplained cash deposit into bank and CIT(A) erred in confirming the same. 2 Jitendra Singh