BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 10Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Kolkata196Mumbai192Delhi120Chennai94Bangalore81Ahmedabad78Pune70Hyderabad53Jaipur40Cuttack28Indore24Lucknow23Chandigarh17Surat16Visakhapatnam14Rajkot13Nagpur11Jabalpur10Jodhpur8Cochin8Patna7Calcutta6Agra6Panaji5Amritsar5Varanasi4Guwahati4Dehradun3Raipur3Allahabad2Ranchi1Karnataka1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 1117Section 44A8Section 2507Section 143(1)6Section 12A6Section 143(3)5Section 12A(1)(b)4Section 1444Exemption

GRAM NIRMAN MANDAL,NAWADA vs. DC/AC EXEMPTION, CIR, PATNA, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 336/PAT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna27 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 10Section 11Section 143(3)Section 250

condoning the delay in filing the Form 10B of the Act. The learned Tribunal after going through the facts of the case took note of the latter circular issued by the Board in Circular No. 16 of 2022 dated 19-07-2022 issued under Section

PARTH SARTHI BALY SHILPI EDUCATIONAL TRUST,VAISHALI, HAJIPUR vs. CPC, BENGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes

4
Condonation of Delay3
Natural Justice2
Penalty2
ITA 556/PAT/2024[2020-21]Status: Disposed
ITAT Patna
20 Mar 2025
AY 2020-21
Section 11Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 250

10B was later condoned by the CIT(E).", "held": "The Tribunal noted that the grievance of the assessee was settled with the condonation of delay. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the AO to give consequential effect to the order of the CIT(E) regarding condonation of delay.", "result": "Allowed", "sections

SHASHI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL AVAM WELFARE SOCIETY,PATNA vs. AO, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 428/PAT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna29 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(b)Section 143(1)Section 250

condoning the delay in\nfiling the Form 10B of the Act. The learned Tribunal after going through the\nfacts of the case took note of the latter circular issued by the Board in\nCircular No. 16 of 2022 dated 19-07-2022 issued under Section

ACIT, PATNA vs. NEW ERA SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT WELFARE SOCIETY, PATNA

Appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 296/PAT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna04 Feb 2025AY 2017-18
Section 10Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(b)Section 139(1)Section 144Section 2Section 250Section 288

section 13(10) of the Act. It is also felt that the assessee could utilise any opportunity for obtaining the condonation of delay in filing of the Form 10B

M/S NORTH BIHAR DISTRIBUTOR,PURNEA vs. ITO, WARD-3(1), PURNEA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 68/PAT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna22 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri R. K. Jha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rupesh Agrawal, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 271BSection 44A

condone the delay in filing the appeal before us and take up the matter for adjudication. 4. Grounds taken by the assessee are:- (a) in ITA No. 48/Pat/2020: 1. For that the appellate order passed u/s. 250 of the Act is bad in law. 2. For that the ld. CIT(appeals) has not been justified in confirming the order passed

M/S NORTH BIHAR DISTRIBUTOR,PURNEA vs. ITO, WARD-3(1), PURNEA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 48/PAT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna22 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri R. K. Jha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rupesh Agrawal, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 271BSection 44A

condone the delay in filing the appeal before us and take up the matter for adjudication. 4. Grounds taken by the assessee are:- (a) in ITA No. 48/Pat/2020: 1. For that the appellate order passed u/s. 250 of the Act is bad in law. 2. For that the ld. CIT(appeals) has not been justified in confirming the order passed

PRESERVATION AND PROLIFERATION OF RURAL RESOURCES AND NATURE,GAYA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, INCOME-TAX, CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 496/PAT/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Patna07 Apr 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11Section 143(1)Section 250

10B was filed in accordance with the provisions of law. 4. That the Id JCIT erred in not allowing benefit of Section 11 of the act while computing total income for the relevant year. 5. That the Id JCIT erred in confirming the total income for the relevant year, as computed in the intimation dated 16.12.2019. 6. For any other