BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 10Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai97Delhi92Mumbai76Kolkata57Ahmedabad51Bangalore45Raipur44Hyderabad40Pune36Jaipur35Visakhapatnam13Surat12Rajkot9Chandigarh6Indore5Lucknow5Amritsar5Patna4Nagpur4Jodhpur3Cuttack3Guwahati3Agra3Calcutta2Telangana2Varanasi2Cochin2Karnataka2Allahabad1Jabalpur1SC1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 12A10Section 44A8Section 143(3)4Condonation of Delay3Section 2502Section 271B2Section 271(1)(c)2Penalty2Addition to Income

KORNIK,DEOGHAR vs. CIT-EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 146/PAT/2019[00]Status: DisposedITAT Patna21 Feb 2022

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 12A

10A is rejected. (H.K. Lal) Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Patna”. 4. The assessee hardly submitted any details to the ld. CIT(Exemption) for grant of registration under section 12AA. Though at present, we are required to consider the issue, whether the delay in filing this appeal before the Tribunal be condoned

M/S NORTH BIHAR DISTRIBUTOR,PURNEA vs. ITO, WARD-3(1), PURNEA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 48/PAT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna22 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal

2
Limitation/Time-bar2
Exemption2
For Appellant: Shri R. K. Jha, CA
For Respondent: Shri Rupesh Agrawal, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 271BSection 44A

condone the delay in filing the appeal before us and take up the matter for adjudication. 4. Grounds taken by the assessee are:- (a) in ITA No. 48/Pat/2020: 1. For that the appellate order passed u/s. 250 of the Act is bad in law. 2. For that the ld. CIT(appeals) has not been justified in confirming the order passed

M/S NORTH BIHAR DISTRIBUTOR,PURNEA vs. ITO, WARD-3(1), PURNEA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 68/PAT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna22 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri R. K. Jha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rupesh Agrawal, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 271BSection 44A

condone the delay in filing the appeal before us and take up the matter for adjudication. 4. Grounds taken by the assessee are:- (a) in ITA No. 48/Pat/2020: 1. For that the appellate order passed u/s. 250 of the Act is bad in law. 2. For that the ld. CIT(appeals) has not been justified in confirming the order passed

SHRIJAN CHARITY,SITAMARHI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 5/PAT/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 Dec 2021AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice- & Shri A.T. Varkey

Section 12A

delay is accordingly condoned and this appeal of the assessee is being disposed of after hearing the arguments of both the sides on merit. 4. The assessee in the present case is a Trust, which filed an application on 31.10.2018 in the prescribed Form No. 10A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 for grant of registration under section