BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 35(1)(ii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka470Mumbai385Delhi380Bangalore218Chennai204Jaipur115Ahmedabad102Hyderabad77Kolkata70Chandigarh70Pune57Lucknow44Cochin36Indore24Amritsar19Calcutta17Cuttack16Visakhapatnam15Agra13Nagpur11Rajkot10Telangana8Surat8Raipur7SC7Varanasi7Kerala5Jodhpur5Dehradun5Patna4Allahabad3Rajasthan3Andhra Pradesh2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Punjab & Haryana1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 2506Section 11(1)6Exemption4Section 253(2)3Section 2(15)3Disallowance3Addition to Income3Condonation of Delay3Section 12A2

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 66/PAT/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 253(2)

ii) Hospital receipts – Rs. 2,70,33,405.96 (iii) Hostel receipts – Rs. 1,63,86,667.00 (iv) Pharmacy receipts – Rs. 35,09,829.00 (v) Other receipts – Rs. 12,24,776.25 Furthermore, the Ld. AO found that the receipts from pharmacy exceeded the tolerance limit of 20% as per the proviso to section 2(15) of the Act. It is seen

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 67/PAT/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 253(2)

ii) Hospital receipts – Rs. 2,70,33,405.96 (iii) Hostel receipts – Rs. 1,63,86,667.00 (iv) Pharmacy receipts – Rs. 35,09,829.00 (v) Other receipts – Rs. 12,24,776.25 Furthermore, the Ld. AO found that the receipts from pharmacy exceeded the tolerance limit of 20% as per the proviso to section 2(15) of the Act. It is seen

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 65/PAT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 253(2)

ii) Hospital receipts – Rs. 2,70,33,405.96 (iii) Hostel receipts – Rs. 1,63,86,667.00 (iv) Pharmacy receipts – Rs. 35,09,829.00 (v) Other receipts – Rs. 12,24,776.25 Furthermore, the Ld. AO found that the receipts from pharmacy exceeded the tolerance limit of 20% as per the proviso to section 2(15) of the Act. It is seen

AMS EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE FOUNDATION,KISHANGANJ vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes as aforesaid

ITA 311/PAT/2018[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Patna29 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri K.M. Mishra, Advocate (AR)For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Mukherjee, CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 80Section 80G(5)

1. For that the order rejecting application is bad in laws because the appellant qualify for grant of registration. ITA No.312/Pat/18 A.Y 2018-19 AMS Educational & Welfare Foundation 2. For that the CIT has fail to appreciate that the appellant had received donation and subscription from known person which were expended wholly on charitable activities. 3. For that the appellant