BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 35(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi514Mumbai505Karnataka472Bangalore272Chennai247Ahmedabad145Jaipur141Pune91Chandigarh88Kolkata80Hyderabad80Lucknow55Cochin45Indore29Cuttack22Rajkot22Amritsar21Surat19Visakhapatnam17Calcutta17Agra17Allahabad15Nagpur15Telangana10Jodhpur9Raipur8Varanasi7SC7Kerala5Dehradun5Patna5Rajasthan3Jabalpur2Andhra Pradesh2Punjab & Haryana1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Orissa1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 2508Section 11(1)6Exemption5Addition to Income4Condonation of Delay4Section 253(2)3Section 2(15)3Disallowance3Section 1472

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 66/PAT/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 253(2)

35,09,829.00 (v) Other receipts – Rs. 12,24,776.25 Furthermore, the Ld. AO found that the receipts from pharmacy exceeded the tolerance limit of 20% as per the proviso to section 2(15) of the Act. It is seen that there is also a supporting finding that considerable expenses have been claimed under the following heads, which have been

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

Section 102
Section 12A2
ITA 67/PAT/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 253(2)

35,09,829.00 (v) Other receipts – Rs. 12,24,776.25 Furthermore, the Ld. AO found that the receipts from pharmacy exceeded the tolerance limit of 20% as per the proviso to section 2(15) of the Act. It is seen that there is also a supporting finding that considerable expenses have been claimed under the following heads, which have been

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 65/PAT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 253(2)

35,09,829.00 (v) Other receipts – Rs. 12,24,776.25 Furthermore, the Ld. AO found that the receipts from pharmacy exceeded the tolerance limit of 20% as per the proviso to section 2(15) of the Act. It is seen that there is also a supporting finding that considerable expenses have been claimed under the following heads, which have been

AMS EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE FOUNDATION,KISHANGANJ vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes as aforesaid

ITA 311/PAT/2018[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Patna29 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri K.M. Mishra, Advocate (AR)For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Mukherjee, CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 80Section 80G(5)

1. For that the order rejecting application is bad in laws because the appellant qualify for grant of registration. ITA No.312/Pat/18 A.Y 2018-19 AMS Educational & Welfare Foundation 2. For that the CIT has fail to appreciate that the appellant had received donation and subscription from known person which were expended wholly on charitable activities. 3. For that the appellant

MAGADH HOMIOPATHIK MEDICAL COLLAGE AND HOSPITAL,BIHAR SHARIF vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 334/PAT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna04 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 10Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250

1 That the appellant has requested before Ld. CIT (A) to adjourned the hearing vide receipt no 896845791080325 dt 08.03.2025. 2. Ground 2 No opportunity was given to be heard before passing the order which is against the natural justice. 3. Ground 3 For that the other grounds of appeal, if any, will be urged at the time of hearing