Search: charitable trust

AMS EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE FOUNDATION,KISHANGANJ vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes as aforesaid

ITA 311/PAT/2018[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Patna29 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri K.M. Mishra, Advocate (AR)For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Mukherjee, CIT(DR)

section of the Act, the materials available on record have been perused to examine the application on both the prescribed grounds i.e. (i) objects of Trust/Society and (ii the genuineness of activities claimed. During the course of examination, it is found that the applicant in his audit report has claimed some activities as to have been performed in previous years

MAGADH HOMIOPATHIK MEDICAL COLLAGE AND HOSPITAL,BIHAR SHARIF vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 334/PAT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna04 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 10Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250

charitable activities and had not filed its return of income for AY 2018-19. As per the information available with the Assessing Officer (“the Ld. AO”), during the year under consideration the assessee had made cash deposits to the tune of Rs. 54,75,190/- and had received interest of ₹52,971/-. The case was reopened

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 66/PAT/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 253(2)

35,09,829.00 (v) Other receipts – Rs. 12,24,776.25 Furthermore, the Ld. AO found that the receipts from pharmacy exceeded the tolerance limit of 20% as per the proviso to section 2(15) of the Act. It is seen that there is also a supporting finding that considerable expenses have been claimed under the following heads, which have been

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 67/PAT/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 253(2)

35,09,829.00 (v) Other receipts – Rs. 12,24,776.25 Furthermore, the Ld. AO found that the receipts from pharmacy exceeded the tolerance limit of 20% as per the proviso to section 2(15) of the Act. It is seen that there is also a supporting finding that considerable expenses have been claimed under the following heads, which have been

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 65/PAT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 253(2)

35,09,829.00 (v) Other receipts – Rs. 12,24,776.25 Furthermore, the Ld. AO found that the receipts from pharmacy exceeded the tolerance limit of 20% as per the proviso to section 2(15) of the Act. It is seen that there is also a supporting finding that considerable expenses have been claimed under the following heads, which have been