HR DIGHA SHIVALLYA CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. CIT E, PATNA

Appeals are allowed on the basis of finding given in the lead case (ITA No

Bench: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

trust is involved in any commercial activities outside India. It is mater on fact and on the record that the appellant has not carried out any object which were not charitable within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2

DIKSHA EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST, PATNA,PATNA vs. CIT E, PATNA

Appeals are allowed on the basis of finding given in the lead case (ITA No

Bench: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

trust is involved in any commercial activities outside India. It is mater on fact and on the record that the appellant has not carried out any object which were not charitable within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2

SAGYAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH CHARITABLE TRUST,GOPALGANJ vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PATNA

Appeals are allowed on the basis of finding given in the lead case (ITA No

Bench: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

trust is involved in any commercial activities outside India. It is mater on fact and on the record that the appellant has not carried out any object which were not charitable within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2

DIKSHA EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION,PATNA vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, PATNA, PATNA

Appeals are allowed on the basis of finding given in the lead case (ITA No

Bench: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

trust is involved in any commercial activities outside India. It is mater on fact and on the record that the appellant has not carried out any object which were not charitable within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2

M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

2) of Section 263 as inserted w.e.f. 01.06.2015 which conferred the PCIT specific power to revise the assessment where AYs: 2013-14 to 2016-17 M/s Satyam Educational Health & Charitable Trust

M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

2) of Section 263 as inserted w.e.f. 01.06.2015 which conferred the PCIT specific power to revise the assessment where AYs: 2013-14 to 2016-17 M/s Satyam Educational Health & Charitable Trust

M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

2) of Section 263 as inserted w.e.f. 01.06.2015 which conferred the PCIT specific power to revise the assessment where AYs: 2013-14 to 2016-17 M/s Satyam Educational Health & Charitable Trust

M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

2) of Section 263 as inserted w.e.f. 01.06.2015 which conferred the PCIT specific power to revise the assessment where AYs: 2013-14 to 2016-17 M/s Satyam Educational Health & Charitable Trust

SOCIETY FOR ADVANCEMENT OF VILLAGE ECONOMY,GAYA vs. ACIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

charitable purpose and not any business or profession. 2. FOR THAT Ld. CIT(A) erred in law and on the facts in confirming action of AO assessing income of the appellant Trust at Rs 1,79,64,179/- by invoking ITA No.: 14/PAT/2018 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Society for Advancement of Village Economy. proviso to section

ITO, WARD-1(EXEMPTION), PATNA vs. AISHWARYA FOUNDATION, PATNA

In the result, the appeal is allowed

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 103/Pat/2020 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Aishwarya Foundation, Patna Exemption Vs 46, Patliputra Colony Near Sahyog Hospital Patliputra Colony Patna - 800013 [Pan: Aacta0834A] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Soumitra Choudhury, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Rupesh Agrawal, Sr. D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 13/04/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 03/05/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Sonjoy Sarma: The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Revenue Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) - 1, Patna, (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 10/09/2020, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. The Sole Issue Raised By The Department Before Us In The Instant Lis Relates To The Deletion Of Addition Of Rs.2,61,72,000/- By The Ld. Cit(A) Made By The Assessing Officer In The Assessment Framed U/S 143(3) Of The Act On 30/12/2016 On Account Of Alleged Anonymous Donations Made U/S 115Bbc Of The Act. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Trust Is A Charitable Organization Registered U/S 12Aa Of Act. It Filed Its Return Of Income For The Year Under Consideration On 24/06/2015 Declaring Total Income At ‘Nil’. Case Of Assessee Was Selected For Scrutiny Through Cass Followed By Issuance Of Notice U/S 143(2) & 142(1) Of The Act. During The Course Of Assessment Proceedings, The Assessing Officer Noted From The Income & Expenditure Account That The Assessee Had Shown Income At Rs.2,61,72,000/- Which Was Received As Donation & Incurred Expenses To The Tune Of Rs.2,22,47,910/- Which Resulted In Income Over Expenditure At

charitable or religious trusts or institutions is exempt from income-tax under sections 11 and 12, subject to the fulfilment, inter alia, of certain conditions of application of income and investment in specified modes. Anonymous donation has been defined in the new section to mean any voluntary contribution referred to in section 2

DOLLY GHOSH,BHAGALPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1 PATNA, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

section 2(24) of the Income Tax Act. This definition is very exhaustive, which reads as under:- “(24)"income" includes— (i)profits and gains; (ii)dividend; (iia)voluntary contributions received by a trust created wholly or partly for charitable

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

charitable purpose” u/s 2(15) of the Act. For more clarity, on this issue the matter deserves to be remanded back to the Ld. AO for exactly determining under which object defined in section 2(15) of the Act does the activity of the assessee falls in. Furthermore, the addition made while 6 ITA Nos. 65-67/Pat/2020

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

charitable purpose” u/s 2(15) of the Act. For more clarity, on this issue the matter deserves to be remanded back to the Ld. AO for exactly determining under which object defined in section 2(15) of the Act does the activity of the assessee falls in. Furthermore, the addition made while 6 ITA Nos. 65-67/Pat/2020

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

charitable purpose” u/s 2(15) of the Act. For more clarity, on this issue the matter deserves to be remanded back to the Ld. AO for exactly determining under which object defined in section 2(15) of the Act does the activity of the assessee falls in. Furthermore, the addition made while 6 ITA Nos. 65-67/Pat/2020

FARIDI FOUNDATION,ARRAH vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for\nstatistical purposes

2) of section 115BBC explicitly excludes the religious trust\nas well as religious and charitable trust. It is further submitted

HARDEO DASS NATMULL BAIROLIYA CHARITY TRUST,DARBHANGA vs. THE PRINCIPAL CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

2. For that Ld CIT Exemption erred in holding that maiden transaction of donation to Chief minister relief fund can not be considered as carrying of charitable activities in accordance with the object of trust. 3. For that Ld CIT exemption failed to appreciate the provision of section

HARDEO DASS NATMULL BAIROLIYA CHARITY TRUST,DARBHANGA vs. THE PRINCIPAL CIT(EXEMPTION)PATNA, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

2. For that Ld CIT Exemption erred in holding that maiden transaction of donation to Chief minister relief fund can not be considered as carrying of charitable activities in accordance with the object of trust. 3. For that Ld CIT exemption failed to appreciate the provision of section

SHASHI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL AVAM WELFARE SOCIETY,PATNA vs. AO, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

charitable\nor religious purpose in accordance with the Act. Further, Section\n164(2) provides that in case exemption is denied under section 11,\nsuch income of the trust

MAHARAJADHIRAJA KAMESHWAR SINGH CHARITABLE TRUST,DARBHANGA vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A) In Protest Against The Action Of The Ld. Ao, Cpc, Bengaluru. The Ld. Ao, Cpc Has Denied Exemption U/S 11 Of The Act Since Apparently The Return Was Filed Belatedly U/S 139(4) Of The Act. Before The Ld. Cit(A), It Is Recorded In Para 6.2 That Two Opportunities Given For Presenting The Facts

Charitable Trust before the Ld. CIT(A) were not availed of by the assessee. Due to this the Ld. CIT(A) passed an exparte order. 3. Aggrieved with the action of Ld. CIT(A), the assessee has filed the present appeal with the following grounds: “1. For that the order passed by the authorities below