BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

15 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 18clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi758Mumbai752Karnataka545Chennai394Bangalore372Pune240Jaipur216Ahmedabad204Kolkata142Hyderabad138Chandigarh110Lucknow70Indore64Cochin59Amritsar56Cuttack50Visakhapatnam44Nagpur37Rajkot37Allahabad32Raipur32Surat29Agra26Telangana22Calcutta18Patna15SC14Jodhpur14Panaji14Varanasi10Ranchi9Kerala9Rajasthan7Punjab & Haryana6Jabalpur3Dehradun2Himachal Pradesh2Andhra Pradesh2Guwahati2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 12A30Section 143(3)17Section 153A16Section 26314Section 12A(1)(ac)12Charitable Trust9Exemption8Addition to Income8Section 80G6

AKSHAY EDUCATIONAL & SOCIAL WELFARE CHARITABLE TRUST,BODHGAYA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-3, GAYA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 3/PAT/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Patna11 Jan 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No.03/Pat/2017 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Akshay Educational & Social Welfare Charitable Trust............……….……Appellant Amawa (Thakar), Bodhgaya-824234. [Pan:Aacta5613R] Vs. Dcit, Circle-3, Gaya….....………............…............……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri A.K. Rastogi, Sr. Adv. & Shri Rakesh Kumar, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Smt. Rinku Singh, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : November 21, 2022 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 11, 2023 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 26.08.2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Patna [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). The Assessee In This Appeal Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

Section 11Section 12ASection 250

Charitable Trust support and sponsor the program and project of the assessee and to be utilized exclusively for the purpose of the trust activities. However, in the second part, it has been mentioned that 80,000 euros (equivalent to Rs.57,25,000) were sent by way of donation for infrastructural development and other development work and in case of other

Section 1326
Section 115
Limitation/Time-bar4

DIKSHA EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION,PATNA vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, PATNA, PATNA

Appeals are allowed on the basis of finding given in the lead case (ITA No

ITA 594/PAT/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Patna21 May 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 18Section 2(15)

Charitable Trust “4. In response to the letter dated 06.07.2024, applicant submitted a copy of letter of permission issued under section 18

HR DIGHA SHIVALLYA CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. CIT E, PATNA

Appeals are allowed on the basis of finding given in the lead case (ITA No

ITA 596/PAT/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Patna21 May 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 18Section 2(15)

Charitable Trust “4. In response to the letter dated 06.07.2024, applicant submitted a copy of letter of permission issued under section 18

DIKSHA EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST, PATNA,PATNA vs. CIT E, PATNA

Appeals are allowed on the basis of finding given in the lead case (ITA No

ITA 595/PAT/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Patna21 May 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 18Section 2(15)

Charitable Trust “4. In response to the letter dated 06.07.2024, applicant submitted a copy of letter of permission issued under section 18

SAGYAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH CHARITABLE TRUST,GOPALGANJ vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PATNA

Appeals are allowed on the basis of finding given in the lead case (ITA No

ITA 597/PAT/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Patna21 May 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 18Section 2(15)

Charitable Trust “4. In response to the letter dated 06.07.2024, applicant submitted a copy of letter of permission issued under section 18

M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 36/PAT/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 Mar 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 132Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

18 of the questionnaire issued with the notice as stated above and was also replied by submitting that documents did not relate to the trust but to the company M/s Pratiti Health Institution Pvt. Ltd. of which Shri Shankar Kumar and his family members are holding 49% shares and the said company was doing construction

M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 37/PAT/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 Mar 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 132Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

18 of the questionnaire issued with the notice as stated above and was also replied by submitting that documents did not relate to the trust but to the company M/s Pratiti Health Institution Pvt. Ltd. of which Shri Shankar Kumar and his family members are holding 49% shares and the said company was doing construction

M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 39/PAT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 Mar 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 132Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

18 of the questionnaire issued with the notice as stated above and was also replied by submitting that documents did not relate to the trust but to the company M/s Pratiti Health Institution Pvt. Ltd. of which Shri Shankar Kumar and his family members are holding 49% shares and the said company was doing construction

M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 38/PAT/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 Mar 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 132Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

18 of the questionnaire issued with the notice as stated above and was also replied by submitting that documents did not relate to the trust but to the company M/s Pratiti Health Institution Pvt. Ltd. of which Shri Shankar Kumar and his family members are holding 49% shares and the said company was doing construction

SHRI NARNAULIYE AGRAWAL SEWA SAMITI,SHER GHATI GAYA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 68/PAT/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Patna15 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 12ASection 80G

18-August-2025 Date of pronouncing the order : 15-September-2025 ORDER PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: Both these appeals filed by the assessee are against the separate orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions)-Patna [hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT (Exemption)/the Ld. CIT(E)”] passed in respect of registration u/s 80G and 12AB

SHRI NARNAULIYE AGRAWAL SEWA SAMITI,SHERGHATI GAYA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 69/PAT/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Patna15 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 12ASection 80G

18-August-2025 Date of pronouncing the order : 15-September-2025 ORDER PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: Both these appeals filed by the assessee are against the separate orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions)-Patna [hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT (Exemption)/the Ld. CIT(E)”] passed in respect of registration u/s 80G and 12AB

M/S PARWATI EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR.CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 45/PAT/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Patna23 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma)

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

18,92,660/- only. The appellant submitted that the cash deposit are duly covered from the cash received by the appellant in the normal educational activity carried on by the appellant. The appellant explained that main account remained was maintained with Canara Bank. The appellant has deposited cash of RS9,90,000/-into the loan account maintained with United Bank

M/S PARWATI EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR.CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 44/PAT/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Patna23 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma)

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

18,92,660/- only. The appellant submitted that the cash deposit are duly covered from the cash received by the appellant in the normal educational activity carried on by the appellant. The appellant explained that main account remained was maintained with Canara Bank. The appellant has deposited cash of RS9,90,000/-into the loan account maintained with United Bank

SARVODAYA SAMAJ KALYAN SANSTHAN,JAMUI vs. CPC , BANGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 563/PAT/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Patna26 Nov 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 10Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250

charitable purpose within the meaning of section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act. The aggregate annual receipts from fee of students were Rs.18,18,863/- and after expending Rs.15,76,363/- on maintenance and salary of staff, there was a surplus of Rs.2,42,499/-, which was treated as income, even though the assessee is exempt from income

DOLLY GHOSH,BHAGALPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1 PATNA, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 182/PAT/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 Oct 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 269SSection 269TSection 271DSection 271E

18,26,153/- in cash. The evidence also disclosed that the appellant has also taken loan in cash on various dates, aggregating to Rs.13,00,000/-. Under the background facts, therefore, the Assessing Officer had sufficient documentary evidence to having formed reason to believe that income assessable to tax had escaped assessment and accordingly had acquired jurisdiction under section