M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 153A of the Act from AY 2013-14 to 2016-17 were erroneous in so far as prejudicial to the interest of the revenue as the AO has failed to take necessary action in examining the various issues and apply his mind properly. Accordingly, the Ld. PCIT issued show cause notices u/s 263 of the Act dated

M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 153A of the Act from AY 2013-14 to 2016-17 were erroneous in so far as prejudicial to the interest of the revenue as the AO has failed to take necessary action in examining the various issues and apply his mind properly. Accordingly, the Ld. PCIT issued show cause notices u/s 263 of the Act dated

M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 153A of the Act from AY 2013-14 to 2016-17 were erroneous in so far as prejudicial to the interest of the revenue as the AO has failed to take necessary action in examining the various issues and apply his mind properly. Accordingly, the Ld. PCIT issued show cause notices u/s 263 of the Act dated

M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 153A of the Act from AY 2013-14 to 2016-17 were erroneous in so far as prejudicial to the interest of the revenue as the AO has failed to take necessary action in examining the various issues and apply his mind properly. Accordingly, the Ld. PCIT issued show cause notices u/s 263 of the Act dated

SHASHI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL AVAM WELFARE SOCIETY,PATNA vs. AO, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

Charitable & Chaleshwar Temple\nTrust vs. Commissioner of Income-tax [1994] 207 ITR 368\n(Bombay)/[1994] 118 CTR 305 (Bombay)[16-09-1993]. On the other\nhand, the Ld. DR relied upon the order of the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A) and\nrequested that the same may be upheld.\n\n6. We have considered the submissions made, gone through the\nfacts

DOLLY GHOSH,BHAGALPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1 PATNA, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

charitable or religious purposes or by an institution established wholly or partly for such purposes or by an association or institution referred to in clause (21) or clause (23), or by a fund or trust or institution referred to in sub-clause (iv) or sub-clause (v) or by any university or other educational institution referred to in sub-clause

M/S PARWATI EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR.CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Sri Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma)

Charitable Trust wherein the facts are almost similar, this Tribunal after considering the judicial precedence, quashed the revisionary proceedings u/s 263 of the Act observing as follows: “5. We have heard rival contentions and perused the facts on record carefully including the revisionary orders passed u/s 263 of the Act and various decisions cited before us. We note that

M/S PARWATI EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR.CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Sri Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma)

Charitable Trust wherein the facts are almost similar, this Tribunal after considering the judicial precedence, quashed the revisionary proceedings u/s 263 of the Act observing as follows: “5. We have heard rival contentions and perused the facts on record carefully including the revisionary orders passed u/s 263 of the Act and various decisions cited before us. We note that

MAGADH HOMIOPATHIK MEDICAL COLLAGE AND HOSPITAL,BIHAR SHARIF vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

17-September-2025 Date of pronouncing the order : 04-December-2025 ORDER PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as Ld. 'CIT(A)'] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred

ALMAHAD TRUST ,PATNA vs. ITO EXEMPTION, WARD-1, PATNA , PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI SONJOY SARMA (Judicial Member)

section 250 of the Act was filed on 21.10.2025 4. That as per the provisions as contained in the Act the appellant was required to file the appeal within period of 60 days from the date of the receipt of the order. Thus, there is a delay of approximately 13 months and 17 days in the tiling of the present

RADHA GOVIND PUBLIC WELFARE SOCIETY,RAMGARH vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2015-16

trust registered u/s. 12AA of the Act vide registration order dated 26.07.2005. Assessee filed its return of income reporting total income as nil. Assessment was completed u/s. 143(3) vide order dated 03.11.2016 wherein returned income was accepted. Subsequent to the said assessment, Ld. CIT issued a show cause notice dated 04.10.2017 on twelve different issues for invoking revisionary proceeding