DIKSHA EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION,PATNA vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, PATNA, PATNA

Appeals are allowed on the basis of finding given in the lead case (ITA No

Bench: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

3 ITA Nos. 594-597/PAT/2024 Diksha Educational Research Foundation Diksha Educational Research Foundation Charitable Trust HR Digha Shivallya Charitable Trust Sagyan Educational Research Charitable Trust “4. In response to the letter dated 06.07.2024, applicant submitted a copy of letter of permission issued under section 18 of RTE Act, 2009 by the State Government to the School being

HR DIGHA SHIVALLYA CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. CIT E, PATNA

Appeals are allowed on the basis of finding given in the lead case (ITA No

Bench: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

3 ITA Nos. 594-597/PAT/2024 Diksha Educational Research Foundation Diksha Educational Research Foundation Charitable Trust HR Digha Shivallya Charitable Trust Sagyan Educational Research Charitable Trust “4. In response to the letter dated 06.07.2024, applicant submitted a copy of letter of permission issued under section 18 of RTE Act, 2009 by the State Government to the School being

DIKSHA EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST, PATNA,PATNA vs. CIT E, PATNA

Appeals are allowed on the basis of finding given in the lead case (ITA No

Bench: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

3 ITA Nos. 594-597/PAT/2024 Diksha Educational Research Foundation Diksha Educational Research Foundation Charitable Trust HR Digha Shivallya Charitable Trust Sagyan Educational Research Charitable Trust “4. In response to the letter dated 06.07.2024, applicant submitted a copy of letter of permission issued under section 18 of RTE Act, 2009 by the State Government to the School being

SAGYAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH CHARITABLE TRUST,GOPALGANJ vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PATNA

Appeals are allowed on the basis of finding given in the lead case (ITA No

Bench: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

3 ITA Nos. 594-597/PAT/2024 Diksha Educational Research Foundation Diksha Educational Research Foundation Charitable Trust HR Digha Shivallya Charitable Trust Sagyan Educational Research Charitable Trust “4. In response to the letter dated 06.07.2024, applicant submitted a copy of letter of permission issued under section 18 of RTE Act, 2009 by the State Government to the School being

FARIDI FOUNDATION,ARRAH vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PATNA

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishraι.Τ.Α. No.: 223/Pat/2023

12A read with section 12AB(1)(b) of the Act. The applicant is a Trust. The address of the Trust is Waliganj, Arrah. The Ld. CIT (Exemption) issued a letter dated 20.12.2022 requiring the assessee to Page | 3 Ι.Τ.Α. No.: 223/PAT/2023 Assessment Year: 2023-24 Faridi Foundation. submit the documents related to notes on activities undertaken

HARDEO DASS NATMULL BAIROLIYA CHARITY TRUST,DARBHANGA vs. THE PRINCIPAL CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

charitable activities in accordance with the object of trust. 3. For that Ld CIT exemption failed to appreciate the provision of section 12A

HARDEO DASS NATMULL BAIROLIYA CHARITY TRUST,DARBHANGA vs. THE PRINCIPAL CIT(EXEMPTION)PATNA, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

charitable activities in accordance with the object of trust. 3. For that Ld CIT exemption failed to appreciate the provision of section 12A

ACIT, PATNA vs. NEW ERA SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT WELFARE SOCIETY, PATNA

Appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Charitable Trust registered u/s. 12A of the Act as mentioned by the AO in the beginning of his assessment order. The case of the assessee was selected for complete scrutiny under CASS with a reason for non-filing of Audit Report in Form 10B/10BB. In response to the statutory notices issued by the AO, the assessee did not respond. Therefore

OOSMANIA TRUST,MUZAFFARPUR vs. CIT (E), PATNA, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

3. Brief facts of the case as conveyed during the course of the hearing are that the assessee is an old Trust formed on 27.07.1978 and had filed an application in Form No. 10AB on 15.02.2025 for grant of regular registration under sub-clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A read with section 12AB

ST JOHNS EDUCATION TRUST,PATNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

3. Rival contentions were heard and the submissions made have been examined. We will first take up the appeal in I.T.A. No.670/PAT/2024. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a trust and had applied for registration under section 12A of the Act. In response to the queries raised by the Ld. CIT(E), it made submission

ST JOHNS SOCIETY FOR EDUCATION,HAJIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

3. Rival contentions were heard and the submissions made have been examined. We will first take up the appeal in I.T.A. No.670/PAT/2024. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a trust and had applied for registration under section 12A of the Act. In response to the queries raised by the Ld. CIT(E), it made submission

GURUDWARA BAL LEELA MANINI SANGAL TRUST,PATNA vs. DCIT, CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 10/Pat/2022 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Gurudwara Bal Leela Manini Sangat Trust National Faceless Appeal Patna Sahib Vs Centre, Delhi Patna City Patna - 800008 [Pan: Aabtg9954E] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri D.V. Pathy, Advocate & Shri Hiresh Karana, Advocate Revenue By : Md. A.H. Chowdhary, Cit D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 05/03/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 21/03/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per, Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 29/12/2021, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. Though The Assessee Has Raised Eight Grounds Of Appeal But The Grievance Are Two Fold:- (I) The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Dismissing The Appeal In Limine For Delay Of 1423 Days In Filing Of The Appeal Ignoring The Fact That The Delay Occurred Due To Fault Of The Counsel, Who Had Bona Fide Belief That The Impugned Order Is Rectifiable.

3 I.T.A. No. 10/Pat/2022 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Gurudwara Bal Leela Manini Sangat Trust an appellate remedy. At that point of time, I realized that I had taken or wrong decision to pursue a remedy of rectification under Section 154 of the Act. 7. That I admit that the delay in filing the appeal primarily arose due to a wrong

MAHARAJADHIRAJA KAMESHWAR SINGH CHARITABLE TRUST,DARBHANGA vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A) In Protest Against The Action Of The Ld. Ao, Cpc, Bengaluru. The Ld. Ao, Cpc Has Denied Exemption U/S 11 Of The Act Since Apparently The Return Was Filed Belatedly U/S 139(4) Of The Act. Before The Ld. Cit(A), It Is Recorded In Para 6.2 That Two Opportunities Given For Presenting The Facts

Charitable Trust before the Ld. CIT(A) were not availed of by the assessee. Due to this the Ld. CIT(A) passed an exparte order. 3. Aggrieved with the action of Ld. CIT(A), the assessee has filed the present appeal with the following grounds: “1. For that the order passed by the authorities below

DAWAT E ISLAMI HIND,JAMSHDPUR vs. CIT-EXEMPTION, PATNA

The appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Rajesh Kumar

3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee has filed an application in Form No. 10A on 17.01.2018 for grant of registration under section 12A(a). This application of the assessee has been rejected by the ld. Commissioner. On perusal of the order suggests that ld. Commissioner treated the assessee-Trust as a Charitable

GURUDWARA BAL LEELA MAINI SANGAT TRUST,PATNA vs. DC/AC, EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

charitable trust registered u/s 12A of the Act through an order dated 27.12.2019. The Ld. AO made the following two additions: (i) depreciation Rs. – 61,27,941/- I.T.A. No. 299/Pat/2024 Gurudwara Bal Leela Maini Sangat Trust (ii) Cash deposited in bank Rs. – 49,88,100/-. 1.2. It is seen that the addition on account of depreciation has been made

KARAM AGRAMI AMAN AUR MAITRI SANSTAN,RANCHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA, PATNA

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Patna For Rejection Of Registration Under Section 12Ab(1)(B)(Iii) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The Said Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Patna Was Passed & Received On The Same Date By Mail. Therefore, The Appeal Should Have Been Instituted Within 60 Days From Receipt Of Such Order I.E., On Or Before 04.05.2024. I.T.A. No. 505/Pat/2024 Karam Agrami Aman Aur Maitri Sanstan

Trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the IT Act 1961 Therefore, the application filed in Form 10AB for grant of regular registration under sub clause (iii) of clause (ac) of subsection (1) of section 12A is rejected." Although, the Appellant complied necessary Rule 17A of Income

SHRI BHUDHARMAL DHANDHANIA,BHAGALPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

12A of the Act. However, the ld. CIT(A) rejecting the same observing that the assessee has been giving the rooms of Dharmshala complex on rent and also offering marriage hall for I.T.A. No.: 231/PAT/2023 Bhudharmal Dhandhania, consideration. Therefore, the activity of the assessee was commercial in nature and not charitable. 3. Before us, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee

SARVODAYA SAMAJ KALYAN SANSTHAN,JAMUI vs. CPC , BANGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

3. None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of hearing. Therefore, we have decided to dispose of the appeal after hearing the ld. ITA No.: 563/PAT/2024 Assessment Year: 2018-19 Sarvodaya Samaj Kalyan Sansthan Departmental Representative and perusing the material available on record. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an educational Trust

NEXGENHUMAN,PATNA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

trust established on 20.03.2018 to carry out charitable activities in the field of education, medical relief to the poor and other in its objects. An application in Form 10AB was filed for grant of regular registration under sub-clause (iii) of Clause (ac) of sub-section 1 of Section 12A of the Act. The Ld. CIT(E ) requested from