FARIDI FOUNDATION,ARRAH vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for\nstatistical purposes

b) of the Act. The applicant\nis a Trust. The address of the Trust is Waliganj, Arrah. The Ld. CIT\n(Exemption) issued a letter dated 20.12.2022 requiring the assessee to\nPage | 3\nΙ.Τ.Α. No.: 223/PAT/2023\n Assessment Year: 2023-24\nFaridi Foundation.\nsubmit the documents related to notes on activities undertaken by the\napplicant during the last

ACIT, PATNA vs. NEW ERA SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT WELFARE SOCIETY, PATNA

Appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

b) is as under: "If total income of the trust or insinuation as computed under this act without giving effect to the provisions of section 11 and section 12 exceeds [the maximum amount (i.e. Rs.2.50 thousand) which is not chargeable to Income tax) in any previous year, the accounts of the trust or institution for that year have been audited

ITO, WARD-1(EXEMPTION), PATNA vs. AISHWARYA FOUNDATION, PATNA

In the result, the appeal is allowed

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 103/Pat/2020 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Aishwarya Foundation, Patna Exemption Vs 46, Patliputra Colony Near Sahyog Hospital Patliputra Colony Patna - 800013 [Pan: Aacta0834A] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Soumitra Choudhury, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Rupesh Agrawal, Sr. D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 13/04/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 03/05/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Sonjoy Sarma: The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Revenue Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) - 1, Patna, (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 10/09/2020, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. The Sole Issue Raised By The Department Before Us In The Instant Lis Relates To The Deletion Of Addition Of Rs.2,61,72,000/- By The Ld. Cit(A) Made By The Assessing Officer In The Assessment Framed U/S 143(3) Of The Act On 30/12/2016 On Account Of Alleged Anonymous Donations Made U/S 115Bbc Of The Act. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Trust Is A Charitable Organization Registered U/S 12Aa Of Act. It Filed Its Return Of Income For The Year Under Consideration On 24/06/2015 Declaring Total Income At ‘Nil’. Case Of Assessee Was Selected For Scrutiny Through Cass Followed By Issuance Of Notice U/S 143(2) & 142(1) Of The Act. During The Course Of Assessment Proceedings, The Assessing Officer Noted From The Income & Expenditure Account That The Assessee Had Shown Income At Rs.2,61,72,000/- Which Was Received As Donation & Incurred Expenses To The Tune Of Rs.2,22,47,910/- Which Resulted In Income Over Expenditure At

b) any trust or institution created or established wholly for religious and charitable purposes other than any anonymous donation made with a specific direction that such donation is for any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institution run by such trust or institution. (3) For the purposes of this section, "anonymous donation" means any voluntary

SHASHI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL AVAM WELFARE SOCIETY,PATNA vs. AO, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

12 cases in Maharashtra and Karnataka that ITD denied\nexemptions under section 11, but allowed deductions for expenditure\nto the extent of Rs. 322.42 crore involving tax effect of Rs. 108.29\ncrore. One such case is illustrated below:\n\n6.5.1 In CIT (E), Mumbai charge, the scrutiny assessment of a trust\nfor AY 2014-15 was completed in December

G D MOTHER EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. Nos. 309, 310, 311 & 312/Pat/2023 Assessment Years: 2018-2019 To 2021-2022 G.D. Mother Educational Society,……………Appellant Akharaghat Road, Muzaffarpur-842001, Bihar [Pan:Aaaag3023A] -Vs.- Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna,………………….……………………………….Respondent Aayakar Bhawan, Near Nehru Stadium, Sikandarpur, Muzaffarpur-842001, Bihar Appearances By: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Puja Somani, C.A., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Ashok Kumar, Cit (D.R.), Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: October 25, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: November 20, 2024 O R D E R

Charitable Society -vs.- PCIT [2024] 166 taxmann.com 324 (Delhi-Trib.). The ld. A.R. also stated that the ld. Assessing Officer had himself invalidated the notices issued under section 148 of the Act dated 30.06.2021 for assessment years 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21 by issuing fresh notices under section 148A(b) of the Act dated 25.05.2022 post the judgment

G D MOTHER EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. Nos. 309, 310, 311 & 312/Pat/2023 Assessment Years: 2018-2019 To 2021-2022 G.D. Mother Educational Society,……………Appellant Akharaghat Road, Muzaffarpur-842001, Bihar [Pan:Aaaag3023A] -Vs.- Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna,………………….……………………………….Respondent Aayakar Bhawan, Near Nehru Stadium, Sikandarpur, Muzaffarpur-842001, Bihar Appearances By: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Puja Somani, C.A., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Ashok Kumar, Cit (D.R.), Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: October 25, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: November 20, 2024 O R D E R

Charitable Society -vs.- PCIT [2024] 166 taxmann.com 324 (Delhi-Trib.). The ld. A.R. also stated that the ld. Assessing Officer had himself invalidated the notices issued under section 148 of the Act dated 30.06.2021 for assessment years 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21 by issuing fresh notices under section 148A(b) of the Act dated 25.05.2022 post the judgment

GD MOTHER EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ,MUZAFFARPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. Nos. 309, 310, 311 & 312/Pat/2023 Assessment Years: 2018-2019 To 2021-2022 G.D. Mother Educational Society,……………Appellant Akharaghat Road, Muzaffarpur-842001, Bihar [Pan:Aaaag3023A] -Vs.- Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna,………………….……………………………….Respondent Aayakar Bhawan, Near Nehru Stadium, Sikandarpur, Muzaffarpur-842001, Bihar Appearances By: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Puja Somani, C.A., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Ashok Kumar, Cit (D.R.), Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: October 25, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: November 20, 2024 O R D E R

Charitable Society -vs.- PCIT [2024] 166 taxmann.com 324 (Delhi-Trib.). The ld. A.R. also stated that the ld. Assessing Officer had himself invalidated the notices issued under section 148 of the Act dated 30.06.2021 for assessment years 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21 by issuing fresh notices under section 148A(b) of the Act dated 25.05.2022 post the judgment

G D MOTHER EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. Nos. 309, 310, 311 & 312/Pat/2023 Assessment Years: 2018-2019 To 2021-2022 G.D. Mother Educational Society,……………Appellant Akharaghat Road, Muzaffarpur-842001, Bihar [Pan:Aaaag3023A] -Vs.- Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna,………………….……………………………….Respondent Aayakar Bhawan, Near Nehru Stadium, Sikandarpur, Muzaffarpur-842001, Bihar Appearances By: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Puja Somani, C.A., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Ashok Kumar, Cit (D.R.), Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: October 25, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: November 20, 2024 O R D E R

Charitable Society -vs.- PCIT [2024] 166 taxmann.com 324 (Delhi-Trib.). The ld. A.R. also stated that the ld. Assessing Officer had himself invalidated the notices issued under section 148 of the Act dated 30.06.2021 for assessment years 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21 by issuing fresh notices under section 148A(b) of the Act dated 25.05.2022 post the judgment

KARAM AGRAMI AMAN AUR MAITRI SANSTAN,RANCHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA, PATNA

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Patna For Rejection Of Registration Under Section 12Ab(1)(B)(Iii) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The Said Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Patna Was Passed & Received On The Same Date By Mail. Therefore, The Appeal Should Have Been Instituted Within 60 Days From Receipt Of Such Order I.E., On Or Before 04.05.2024. I.T.A. No. 505/Pat/2024 Karam Agrami Aman Aur Maitri Sanstan

Section 12AB(1)(b)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The said Order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Patna was passed & received on the same date by mail. Therefore, the appeal should have been instituted within 60 days from receipt of such order i.e., on or before 04.05.2024. I.T.A. No. 505/Pat/2024 Karam Agrami Aman

DOLLY GHOSH,BHAGALPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1 PATNA, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

12, Smt. Dolly Ghosh took loan in cash of Rs 13,00.000/- on various dates and repaid a total of Rs.33,99,655/-. Out of the total repayment, Rs.15.73.502/- has been made through bank account while the rest Rs.18,26.153/- was repaid in cash. Thus by accepting loan in cash of Rs.13.00,000/- she violated section 269SS and is liable

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

12-13 Advertisement 3,881,536.00 36,890.00 Consumables 5,387,964.00 3,853,562.00 Power & Fuel 2,301,813.00 1,746,850.00 Legal & Professional 1,465,212.00 0.00 Charges Welfare Expenses 860,163.80 0.00 Travelling & Conveyance 2,834,827.00 68,140.00 Thereafter, it is also recorded in the Ld. AO’s order that the expenses could not be fully

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

12-13 Advertisement 3,881,536.00 36,890.00 Consumables 5,387,964.00 3,853,562.00 Power & Fuel 2,301,813.00 1,746,850.00 Legal & Professional 1,465,212.00 0.00 Charges Welfare Expenses 860,163.80 0.00 Travelling & Conveyance 2,834,827.00 68,140.00 Thereafter, it is also recorded in the Ld. AO’s order that the expenses could not be fully

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

12-13 Advertisement 3,881,536.00 36,890.00 Consumables 5,387,964.00 3,853,562.00 Power & Fuel 2,301,813.00 1,746,850.00 Legal & Professional 1,465,212.00 0.00 Charges Welfare Expenses 860,163.80 0.00 Travelling & Conveyance 2,834,827.00 68,140.00 Thereafter, it is also recorded in the Ld. AO’s order that the expenses could not be fully

SARVODAYA SAMAJ KALYAN SANSTHAN,JAMUI vs. CPC , BANGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

12. For that Without prejudice to the above, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), without appreciating the fact that the appellant trust is accredited educational institution of government and gross receipt is below threshold limit of Rs1,00,00,000/- prescribed by section 10(23C)(iiiad), is not at all justified in granting the alternate claim of exemption under section

SHRI NARNAULIYE AGRAWAL SEWA SAMITI,SHERGHATI GAYA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for AY 2025- 26 dated 18.12.2024. Since the issues are common, both the appeals were heard together and are being decided vide this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds

SHRI NARNAULIYE AGRAWAL SEWA SAMITI,SHER GHATI GAYA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for AY 2025- 26 dated 18.12.2024. Since the issues are common, both the appeals were heard together and are being decided vide this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds

AMS EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE FOUNDATION,KISHANGANJ vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes as aforesaid

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey & Shri Girish Agrawal

1. For that the order rejecting application is bad in laws because the appellant qualify for grant of registration. ITA No.312/Pat/18 A.Y 2018-19 AMS Educational & Welfare Foundation 2. For that the CIT has fail to appreciate that the appellant had received donation and subscription from known person which were expended wholly on charitable activities. 3. For that the appellant

RADHA GOVIND PUBLIC WELFARE SOCIETY,RAMGARH vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2015-16

trust had taken a personal loan of Rs.35 lacs from Axis Bank on 07.12.2011 which was on the very same day infused in the assessee’s bank account and was utilised for the charitable purpose of the assessee. According to Ld. Counsel, it is not correct to say that personal benefit was enjoyed by Shri B. N. Sah, Secretary