M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Charitable Trust the assessment records came to the conclusion that the assessment orders passed by the AO u/s 143(3) read with Section 153A of the Act from AY 2013-14 to 2016-17 were erroneous in so far as prejudicial to the interest of the revenue as the AO has failed to take necessary action in examining the various

M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Charitable Trust the assessment records came to the conclusion that the assessment orders passed by the AO u/s 143(3) read with Section 153A of the Act from AY 2013-14 to 2016-17 were erroneous in so far as prejudicial to the interest of the revenue as the AO has failed to take necessary action in examining the various

M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Charitable Trust the assessment records came to the conclusion that the assessment orders passed by the AO u/s 143(3) read with Section 153A of the Act from AY 2013-14 to 2016-17 were erroneous in so far as prejudicial to the interest of the revenue as the AO has failed to take necessary action in examining the various

M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Charitable Trust the assessment records came to the conclusion that the assessment orders passed by the AO u/s 143(3) read with Section 153A of the Act from AY 2013-14 to 2016-17 were erroneous in so far as prejudicial to the interest of the revenue as the AO has failed to take necessary action in examining the various

ITO, WARD-1(EXEMPTION), PATNA vs. AISHWARYA FOUNDATION, PATNA

In the result, the appeal is allowed

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 103/Pat/2020 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Aishwarya Foundation, Patna Exemption Vs 46, Patliputra Colony Near Sahyog Hospital Patliputra Colony Patna - 800013 [Pan: Aacta0834A] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Soumitra Choudhury, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Rupesh Agrawal, Sr. D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 13/04/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 03/05/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Sonjoy Sarma: The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Revenue Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) - 1, Patna, (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 10/09/2020, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. The Sole Issue Raised By The Department Before Us In The Instant Lis Relates To The Deletion Of Addition Of Rs.2,61,72,000/- By The Ld. Cit(A) Made By The Assessing Officer In The Assessment Framed U/S 143(3) Of The Act On 30/12/2016 On Account Of Alleged Anonymous Donations Made U/S 115Bbc Of The Act. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Trust Is A Charitable Organization Registered U/S 12Aa Of Act. It Filed Its Return Of Income For The Year Under Consideration On 24/06/2015 Declaring Total Income At ‘Nil’. Case Of Assessee Was Selected For Scrutiny Through Cass Followed By Issuance Of Notice U/S 143(2) & 142(1) Of The Act. During The Course Of Assessment Proceedings, The Assessing Officer Noted From The Income & Expenditure Account That The Assessee Had Shown Income At Rs.2,61,72,000/- Which Was Received As Donation & Incurred Expenses To The Tune Of Rs.2,22,47,910/- Which Resulted In Income Over Expenditure At

charitable or religious trusts or institutions is exempt from income-tax under sections 11 and 12, subject to the fulfilment

SHASHI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL AVAM WELFARE SOCIETY,PATNA vs. AO, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

charitable\nor religious purpose in accordance with the Act. Further, Section\n164(2) provides that in case exemption is denied under section 11,\nsuch income of the trust shall be charged to tax at maximum marginal\nrate. For the Trusts and Institutions registered under section 12A,\nprovisions of sections 11, 12

FARIDI FOUNDATION,ARRAH vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for\nstatistical purposes

12\nΙ.Τ.Α. No.: 223/PAT/2023\n Assessment Year: 2023-24\nFaridi Foundation.\nin the case of Al-Madina Trust whose objectives are also similar and to\nwhom the final registration was granted and, therefore, there is no\njustification for the Ld. CIT (Exemption) to reject the application for\nregistration in the case of the assessee. We understand that

SOCIETY FOR ADVANCEMENT OF VILLAGE ECONOMY,GAYA vs. ACIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

charitable trust, the exemption u/s 11 cannot be denied. The order of Ld. CIT (A) being unjust and against principles of Natural Justice deserves to be quashed. 3. FOR THAT Ld. CIT (A) erred in law and on facts in confirming action of AO in holding the activities of the appellant trust as 'advancement of any other object of general

GURUDWARA BAL LEELA MANINI SANGAL TRUST,PATNA vs. DCIT, CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 10/Pat/2022 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Gurudwara Bal Leela Manini Sangat Trust National Faceless Appeal Patna Sahib Vs Centre, Delhi Patna City Patna - 800008 [Pan: Aabtg9954E] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri D.V. Pathy, Advocate & Shri Hiresh Karana, Advocate Revenue By : Md. A.H. Chowdhary, Cit D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 05/03/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 21/03/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per, Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 29/12/2021, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. Though The Assessee Has Raised Eight Grounds Of Appeal But The Grievance Are Two Fold:- (I) The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Dismissing The Appeal In Limine For Delay Of 1423 Days In Filing Of The Appeal Ignoring The Fact That The Delay Occurred Due To Fault Of The Counsel, Who Had Bona Fide Belief That The Impugned Order Is Rectifiable.

12 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 4. That since, the gross receipts itself was brought to tax I filed a petition for rectification before the assessing authority on the grounds inter-alia that the order/intimation passed under Section 143 (1) of the Act bringing to tax the gross receipts itself was contrary to several judicial pronouncements

ACIT, PATNA vs. NEW ERA SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT WELFARE SOCIETY, PATNA

Appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

trust or institution for that year have been audited by an accountant as defined in the Explanation of sub section 2 of section 288 and the person in the receipt of the Income furnishes along with the return of income for the relevant assessment year the report of such audit in the prescribed form duly signed and verified by such

SHRI NARNAULIYE AGRAWAL SEWA SAMITI,SHER GHATI GAYA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

12:10 PM which is less than 7 days. Only 5 working days was allowed to respond to department. Honourable Madras High Court Set aside the assessment order and he remanded it to the assessing officer for fresh consideration where just five days is given to file Reply. 4. We responded to department on 09/09/2024 against first notice issued

SHRI NARNAULIYE AGRAWAL SEWA SAMITI,SHERGHATI GAYA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

12:10 PM which is less than 7 days. Only 5 working days was allowed to respond to department. Honourable Madras High Court Set aside the assessment order and he remanded it to the assessing officer for fresh consideration where just five days is given to file Reply. 4. We responded to department on 09/09/2024 against first notice issued

DOLLY GHOSH,BHAGALPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1 PATNA, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

12, Smt. Dolly Ghosh took loan in cash of Rs 13,00.000/- on various dates and repaid a total of Rs.33,99,655/-. Out of the total repayment, Rs.15.73.502/- has been made through bank account while the rest Rs.18,26.153/- was repaid in cash. Thus by accepting loan in cash of Rs.13.00,000/- she violated section 269SS and is liable

ST JOHNS SOCIETY FOR EDUCATION,HAJIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

12. For that the Society has been registered u/s 12A since 2004 and had been assessed as charitable for long time. The Ld. CIT (Exemption) has not found any merit in concluding that the activity of the appellant is not in line with the objects and therefore, the cancellation of registration u/s 12A is unjustified. 13. For that the appellant

ST JOHNS EDUCATION TRUST,PATNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

12. For that the Society has been registered u/s 12A since 2004 and had been assessed as charitable for long time. The Ld. CIT (Exemption) has not found any merit in concluding that the activity of the appellant is not in line with the objects and therefore, the cancellation of registration u/s 12A is unjustified. 13. For that the appellant

KARAM AGRAMI AMAN AUR MAITRI SANSTAN,RANCHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA, PATNA

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Patna For Rejection Of Registration Under Section 12Ab(1)(B)(Iii) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The Said Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Patna Was Passed & Received On The Same Date By Mail. Therefore, The Appeal Should Have Been Instituted Within 60 Days From Receipt Of Such Order I.E., On Or Before 04.05.2024. I.T.A. No. 505/Pat/2024 Karam Agrami Aman Aur Maitri Sanstan

Section 12AB(1)(b)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The said Order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Patna was passed & received on the same date by mail. Therefore, the appeal should have been instituted within 60 days from receipt of such order i.e., on or before 04.05.2024. I.T.A. No. 505/Pat/2024 Karam Agrami Aman

M/S PARWATI EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR.CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Sri Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma)

Charitable Trust wherein the facts are almost similar, this Tribunal after considering the judicial precedence, quashed the revisionary proceedings u/s 263 of the Act observing as follows: “5. We have heard rival contentions and perused the facts on record carefully including the revisionary orders passed u/s 263 of the Act and various decisions cited before us. We note that

M/S PARWATI EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR.CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Sri Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma)

Charitable Trust wherein the facts are almost similar, this Tribunal after considering the judicial precedence, quashed the revisionary proceedings u/s 263 of the Act observing as follows: “5. We have heard rival contentions and perused the facts on record carefully including the revisionary orders passed u/s 263 of the Act and various decisions cited before us. We note that

SARVODAYA SAMAJ KALYAN SANSTHAN,JAMUI vs. CPC , BANGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

12. For that Without prejudice to the above, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), without appreciating the fact that the appellant trust is accredited educational institution of government and gross receipt is below threshold limit of Rs1,00,00,000/- prescribed by section 10(23C)(iiiad), is not at all justified in granting the alternate claim of exemption under section