BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Rectification u/s 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai114Mumbai106Delhi56Ahmedabad44Bangalore42Pune39Kolkata33Lucknow27Karnataka21Jaipur18Visakhapatnam16Hyderabad15Chandigarh15Surat9Indore9Cuttack9Cochin8Rajkot8Agra6Jabalpur5Jodhpur5Patna3Nagpur3Amritsar2Allahabad2Guwahati2Varanasi1Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)6Section 1546Section 104Section 1434Section 12A4Section 2503Section 113Exemption2Charitable Trust2Rectification u/s 154

JEEVAN DEEP CHARITABLE TRUST,MADHUBANI vs. ITO (EXEMPTION) WARD, MUZAFFARPUR, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 257/PAT/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Sept 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Sri Rajesh Kumar & Pradip Kumar Choubey

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250

rectification return by providing registration details u/s 12A of the Act in part A general to claim the exemption u/s 11 of the Act. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order, the present appeal has been preferred. 2. Ld. Counsel for the assessee challenges the impugned order thereby submitting that the appellant is a charitable Trust engaged in running

2

GURUDWARA BAL LEELA MANINI SANGAL TRUST,PATNA vs. DCIT, CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 10/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna21 Mar 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 10/Pat/2022 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Gurudwara Bal Leela Manini Sangat Trust National Faceless Appeal Patna Sahib Vs Centre, Delhi Patna City Patna - 800008 [Pan: Aabtg9954E] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri D.V. Pathy, Advocate & Shri Hiresh Karana, Advocate Revenue By : Md. A.H. Chowdhary, Cit D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 05/03/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 21/03/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per, Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 29/12/2021, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. Though The Assessee Has Raised Eight Grounds Of Appeal But The Grievance Are Two Fold:- (I) The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Dismissing The Appeal In Limine For Delay Of 1423 Days In Filing Of The Appeal Ignoring The Fact That The Delay Occurred Due To Fault Of The Counsel, Who Had Bona Fide Belief That The Impugned Order Is Rectifiable.

For Appellant: Shri D.V. Pathy, Advocate & Shri Hiresh Karana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Md. A.H. Chowdhary, CIT D/R
Section 12Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250

rectification under Section 154 of the Act. 7. That I admit that the delay in filing the appeal primarily arose due to a wrong decision of mine and was indeed my fault. I was apologetic for the delay in filing the appeal which was caused due to my fault as a counsel and that my clients who are charitable trust

SARVODAYA SAMAJ KALYAN SANSTHAN,JAMUI vs. CPC , BANGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 563/PAT/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Patna26 Nov 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 10Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250

u/s 154 of the act. The premise of the Board Instructions as well as the decisions by the higher courts in this regard is that the assessee should get a fair deal. It is, further, irrelevant for the purpose of rectification whether the genesis or the cause of the mistake (in the order/intimation sought to be rectified