FARIDI FOUNDATION,ARRAH vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PATNA

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishraι.Τ.Α. No.: 223/Pat/2023

charitable trust. It is further submitted that the Ld. CIT (Exemption) nowhere doubted the compliance with any other law for the time being in force and a declaration was also filed vide response dated 17.01.2023. The Ld. CIT (Exemption) also had no contrary view relating to the objects of the Trust and only on the basis of genuineness of nature

GURUDWARA BAL LEELA MAINI SANGAT TRUST,PATNA vs. DC/AC, EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

charitable trust registered u/s 12A of the Act through an order dated 27.12.2019. The Ld. AO made the following two additions: (i) depreciation Rs. – 61,27,941/- I.T.A. No. 299/Pat/2024 Gurudwara Bal Leela Maini Sangat Trust (ii) Cash deposited

MAGADH HOMIOPATHIK MEDICAL COLLAGE AND HOSPITAL,BIHAR SHARIF vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Trust engaged in charitable activities and had not filed its return of income for AY 2018-19. As per the information available with the Assessing Officer (“the Ld. AO”), during the year under consideration the assessee had made cash deposits

ALMAHAD TRUST ,PATNA vs. ITO EXEMPTION, WARD-1, PATNA , PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI SONJOY SARMA (Judicial Member)

Trust present appeal This stated the saad paragraph that the delay is wholly attributed to the period of waiting particularly, in view of the settled law that gross receipts we subject to tax only in absence of registration and the expenditure incurred, for carrying out the charitable activity has to be allowed. 6. That I state that the aforementioned trustees