BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “capital gains”+ Section 94(7)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai875Delhi571Chennai223Ahmedabad207Bangalore201Jaipur161Hyderabad122Chandigarh86Kolkata85Cochin80Raipur71Indore62Pune53Surat36Lucknow24Guwahati23Nagpur23Visakhapatnam21Cuttack14Rajkot14Amritsar8Agra7Dehradun7Jodhpur7Varanasi6Jabalpur5Patna5Ranchi3Allahabad2Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 1446Section 143(2)4Section 2504Addition to Income4Section 142(1)3Section 144B3Section 143(3)2Section 242Section 50C(2)2Penalty

SHARDINDU PRASAD SINGH,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-6(4), PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 630/PAT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna15 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 144Section 147Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

7(2), Bangalore Vs N.S. Nagraj (2014) 52 taxman.com 511 (Bangalore-Tribunal) and that too only to the prejudice of Appellant but ignoring the fact that cost of acquisition of land had been reduced from Capital Gain calculated in that case which the A.O. has failed to do in present case and further that the A.O. has ignored the principal

SANJIV KUMAR SINGH,HATHINI vs. NFAC, NEW DELHI

ITA 323/PAT/2023[2020-2021]Status: Disposed
2
Disallowance2
ITAT Patna
31 Dec 2024
AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) I.T.A. No. 323/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2020-2021 Sanjiv Kumar Singh,………………...…………Appellant 23 S/O. Barhma Singh, At Po Hathni, Rohitas-802215, Bihar [Pan:Bmsps6887A] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,…..………………………...Respondent Nfac, New Delhi Appearances By: Smt. Smriti Singh, A.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, Jcit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: December 03, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: December 31, 2024 O R D E R

Section 144Section 144BSection 50CSection 50C(2)

94,940/- by making an addition of Rs.13,60,000/- as short-term capital gains. The addition of Rs.13,60,000/- was made on account of sale of property during the year under consideration wherein the value of the property has been estimated at Rs.64,50,000/- without referring the matter to the valuation authority as per section

LAVANYA ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED,PATNA vs. ITW WARD 2 (1) PATNA, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 342/PAT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna18 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No. 342/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Lavanya Estates Private Limited Vs Income Tax Officer, Kasim Colonydargah Road Ward 2(1), Mahendru, Sultanganj, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Dakbanglow, Patna-800 001 Patna, Bihar-800 006 [Pan : Aadcl0333R] अपीलार्थी/ (Appellant) प्रत्‍यर्थी/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhury, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kr. Shukla, DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 154

7. The above Instruction shall be applicable from the date of its issue and would cover the cases selected under CASS 2015 which are pending scrutiny cases as well as cases selected/being selected under the CASS 2016.” 6.1 Earlier preceding instruction in this regard was 20/2015 which states as under:” “Instruction No. 20/2015 Government of India Ministry of Finance Department

MAHENDRA PRASAD,EAST CHAMPARAN vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, ITD, DELHI, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 717/PAT/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Patna20 May 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 144Section 145(3)Section 24Section 250Section 80C

7. For that the addition of Rs.11,11,023/- on account of estimation of profit in wholesale trading business of kerosene oil is wholly unjustified, since the sale price is controlled and it is not correct to say that purchases are not verifiable. 8. For that the estimation of net profit in transport business and addition

I.T.O. vs. M/S KUMAR CONSTRUCLTION,

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 10/PAT/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Patna17 Oct 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 40A(3)

94,000/- Kamdhenu 13-08-2008 PNB-9926 797760 4,00,000/- 3 Assessment Year: 2009-2010 M/s. Kumar Construction Kamdhenu 18-08-2008 PNB-9926 797762 3,00,000/- M.K Singh 05-06-2008 SBI-347 735721 4,88,000/- M.K Singh 03-07-2008 SBI-347 735726 2,44,500/- M.K Singh