UDAYKUMAR VYAS,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD 1 (5), BSNL RTTC BUILDING
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 262/NAG/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna21 Apr 2026AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Royudaykumar Vyas, Ito, Ward – 1(5) Flat No. 402, Lepresting Vs Nagpur Apartment, Plot No. 105- 106, Ramdaspeth, Nagpur. Pan : Aarpv 4578 K Assessee Respondent
For Appellant: Shri Sameer Wazalwar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Kumar, CIT DR
Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 250Section 50C
43,000/- by invoking section 50C which was added to the total income of the assessee.
4. Being aggrieved, assessee carried the matter to the Ld.
CIT(A), who dismissed the appeal of the assessee. While upholding the addition made by the Ld. AO, Ld. CIT(A) observed that assessee had executed the registered sale deed dated 10.07.2009
4
(Document
