BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “capital gains”+ Section 271(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,111Delhi972Jaipur328Ahmedabad293Chennai239Bangalore214Kolkata186Hyderabad156Pune136Surat126Karnataka115Indore110Chandigarh89Raipur56Calcutta54Lucknow40Nagpur35Visakhapatnam29Cochin25Rajkot24Guwahati24Cuttack23Amritsar23Dehradun14Agra13Telangana13SC12Jodhpur9Patna7Ranchi7Allahabad6Panaji3Jabalpur3Varanasi3Rajasthan2K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Punjab & Haryana1Gauhati1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 2505Section 271(1)(c)5Section 234A4Section 1444Penalty4Natural Justice4Addition to Income4Disallowance3Limitation/Time-bar3

AMIT KUMAR VERMA,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD- 6(1), PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 357/PAT/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna04 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 250Section 271(1)(c)

b. any transaction …… which has the effect of transferring or enabling enjoyment of any immovable property [Section 2(47)(vi)] 6.4 The definition of 'transfer' under section 2(47)(v) includes any arrangement or transaction whereby any rights are handed over in execution of part performance of contract of the nature referred to in section 53A of the Transfer

Section 10(37)2
Section 45(5)2
Section 54B2

SHARDINDU PRASAD SINGH,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-6(4), PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 630/PAT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna15 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 144Section 147Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

capital gain (LTCG) ₹ 1,24,95,128/- as income in assessment made U/s. 144/147 for the A.Υ.: 2016-17 and demanded tax 39,63,956/- (inclusive of interest) and initiate penalty proceeding U/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and its confirmation by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) by dismissing the appellant appeal

VEENA MISHRA THROUGH NITISH MISHRA,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENT.CIR-1, PATNA, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 152/PAT/2025[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 Sept 2025AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 250Section 271(1)(c)

271(1)(b) of the Act in the fact and circumstances of this case and Ld. CIT Appeal erred in confirming the same. 14. For that the ld. Assessing officer has erred in charging interest under the provisions of section 234A, 234B and 234C of the income tax Act, 1961 on the total income as computed in the orders

BAIJU ROY,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-4(2), PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 13/PAT/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna02 Jun 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 10(37)Section 133(6)Section 2(14)(iii)Section 45(5)Section 54BSection 54F

b) In any area within such distance, not being more than eight kilometers, from the local limits of any municipality or cantonment board referred to in item (a), as the Central Government may, having regard to the extent of, and scope for, urbanization of that area and other relevant considerations, specify in this behalf by notification in the Official Gazette

I.T.O. vs. M/S KUMAR CONSTRUCLTION,

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 10/PAT/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Patna17 Oct 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 40A(3)

271(1)(b) for non-compliance of the notices at the end of the assessee. Ultimately the ld. Assessing Officer gone through the books of account submitted before her and made these two additions by recording the following finding:- “Addition u/s 40A(3) for payments exceeding Rs.20,000/- through bearer cheques:- On perusal of Books of A/c of the assessee

RUSHATAM KHAN,PURNEA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3, PURNEA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2013-

ITA 328/PAT/2018[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Patna22 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Sri Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 234ASection 250(6)Section 271(1)(c)

B of the order passed by Ld. assessing officer based on adhoc, presumption, surmise, inference and ignoring facts and circumstances of the case. 4. For that the CIT (Appeal) erred in passing ex-parte confirming adoption of higher valuation Rs. 34,05,000/- & Rs.30,50,000/- i.e. government value relevant to two property adopted for ascertaining capital gain

RUSHATAM KHAN,PURNEA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3, PURNEA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2013-

ITA 329/PAT/2018[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Patna22 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 234ASection 250(6)Section 271(1)(c)

B of the order passed by Ld. assessing officer based on adhoc, presumption, surmise, inference and ignoring facts and circumstances of the case. 4. For that the CIT (Appeal) erred in passing ex-parte confirming adoption of higher valuation Rs. 34,05,000/- & Rs.30,50,000/- i.e. government value relevant to two property adopted for ascertaining capital gain