BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 253(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai267Delhi217Ahmedabad86Chennai71Indore61Jaipur59Chandigarh48Bangalore43Kolkata34Lucknow26Hyderabad25Panaji17Ranchi15Surat14Pune13Raipur13Nagpur12Rajkot11Guwahati10Amritsar9Cochin8Varanasi6Agra5Visakhapatnam5Allahabad4Patna4Cuttack2Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 454Section 2503Section 271(1)(c)3Penalty3Section 10(37)2Section 45(5)2Section 54B2Section 1442Addition to Income2Limitation/Time-bar

RENU DEVI,PATNA vs. ITO, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 672/PAT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) I.T.A. No. 672/Pat/2024 Assessment Year: 2016-2017 Renu Devi,……………………………....….………Appellant D/79, P.C. Colony, Lohia Nagar, Kankarbagh, Patna-800020, Bihar [Pan:Algpd4522P] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,………………………...…….Respondent Ward-6(2), Patna Appearances By: Shri Sudipta Sannigrahi, C.A., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, Jcit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: June 24, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: August 25, 2025 O R D E R

Section 144Section 148Section 2(47)(v)Section 271(1)(c)Section 45Section 48

253. Ld. Addl./JCIT(Appeals) inclined to uphold the order passed by the ld. Assessing Officer and considered the Joint Development Agreement as the basis on which the appellant, who is a part of land owner, has to pay capital gains for AY 2016-17 under the 3 Renu Devi provisions of section 48 of the Act and dismissed

2

BAIJU ROY,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-4(2), PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 13/PAT/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna02 Jun 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 10(37)Section 133(6)Section 2(14)(iii)Section 45(5)Section 54BSection 54F

253 contemplates that the Tribunal may admit an appeal or permit filing of memorandum of cross- objections after expiry of relevant period, if it is satisfied that there was a sufficient cause for not presenting it within that period. This expression sufficient cause employed in the section has also been used identically in sub-section 3 of section

SHIVENDU SHEKHAR SINGH,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD6(5), PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 689/PAT/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Patna04 Jun 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 143(2)Section 250Section 253(3)Section 271(1)(c)

5), Patna, Lok Nayak Jay Prakash Bhawan, Dak Bunglow Chauraha, Patna-800001, Bihar Appearances by: Shri Rakesh Kumar, Advocate, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Ashwani Kumar Singal, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing: May 6, 2025 Date of pronouncing the order: June 04, 2025 O R D E R Per Duvvuru

VIDYOTMA,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-2 (1), SITAMARHI

ITA 378/PAT/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna28 Jan 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 250Section 253Section 271(1)(c)

253 of the I.T. Act 1961 against the order under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, relating to assessment year 2015-16 on the 28-05-2025. Through this appeal should have been filed on or before 27/07/2025. That I, due to illness irregular to open the e-mail and not showing I.T. Portal. As and when