HAMID ALI,ROHTAS vs. ITO, WARD- 3 (4), SASARAM
In the result, ITA No.356/Pat/2025 is partly allowed for statistical purposes and ITA No
ITA 356/PAT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Oct 2025AY 2018-19
Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Rakesh Mishraita Nos.356 & 357/Pat/2025 Assessment Years: 2018-19 Hamid Ali…..……………..……………………….……….……….……Appellant C/O Gulam Murtaza Zakki Shaheed, Sasaram, Rohtas, Bihar – 821115. [Pan: Atppa8563N] Vs. Ito, Ward-3(4), Sasaram.…………………………….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri A.K. Rastogi, Sr. Adv. & Shri Rakesh Kumar, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, Jcit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : October 06, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : October 10, 2025 Order Per Madhumita Roy: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Both Dated 12.12.2024 Passed By Nfac, Delhi Arising Out Of The Orders Dated 23.02.2021 & 23.08.2021 Passed U/S 143(3) & U/S 270A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”] Respectively For Assessment Year 2018-19. Ita No.356/Pat/2025 Relates To Quantum Order Whereas Ita No.357/Pat/2025 Relates To Penalty Order.
Section 143(3)Section 270ASection 50C(2)(a)Section 53C
3. ITA No.356/Pat/2025 - The brief facts leading to the case are that the assessee in his return of income for Assessment Year 2018-19
declared long-term capital gains of Rs.1,90,224/- on sale of immovable property. He has shown total sale consideration of Rs.27,00,000/- and claimed index cost of acquisition of Rs.9,45,200/- and index
