BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 253(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai502Delhi448Chennai169Bangalore119Karnataka90Jaipur64Kolkata56Chandigarh55Indore53Ahmedabad48Pune47Cochin42Raipur31Lucknow28Nagpur26Jodhpur15Surat14Rajkot14Panaji13Visakhapatnam11Amritsar11Cuttack11Hyderabad11Jabalpur8Guwahati6Patna5Varanasi5Allahabad4Telangana4Agra2Dehradun2SC2Calcutta1J&K1

Key Topics

Section 2019Section 2508Section 133A5TDS5Survey u/s 133A5Section 253(3)4Section 194C4Addition to Income4Natural Justice4Limitation/Time-bar

SHIV SHANKAR SINGH CONTRACT PVT LTD,GOPALGANJ vs. ITO, TDS, MUZAFFAPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 91/PAT/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna14 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 133ASection 194CSection 250Section 253(3)

253(3) of Sixty days has expired. However, as decided by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation, in the order dated 23/09/2021, the period till 02/10/2021 shall stand excluded and a limitation period of 90 days would be available. 3) That in view of the above order of Hon'ble Supreme Court

SHIV SHANKAR SINGH CONTRACT PVT LTD,GOPALGANJ vs. ITO, TDS, MUZAFFAPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

4
ITA 92/PAT/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna14 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 133ASection 194CSection 250Section 253(3)

253(3) of Sixty days has expired. However, as decided by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation, in the order dated 23/09/2021, the period till 02/10/2021 shall stand excluded and a limitation period of 90 days would be available. 3) That in view of the above order of Hon'ble Supreme Court

SHIV SHANKAR SINGH CONTRACT PVT LTD,GOPALGANJ vs. ITO, TDS, MUZAFFAPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 94/PAT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna14 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 133ASection 194CSection 250Section 253(3)

253(3) of Sixty days has expired. However, as decided by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation, in the order dated 23/09/2021, the period till 02/10/2021 shall stand excluded and a limitation period of 90 days would be available. 3) That in view of the above order of Hon'ble Supreme Court

SHIV SHANKAR SINGH CONTRACT PVT LTD,GOPALGANJ vs. ITO, TDS, MUZAFFAPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 93/PAT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna14 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 133ASection 194CSection 250Section 253(3)

253(3) of Sixty days has expired. However, as decided by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation, in the order dated 23/09/2021, the period till 02/10/2021 shall stand excluded and a limitation period of 90 days would be available. 3) That in view of the above order of Hon'ble Supreme Court

SYNDICATE BANK,PATNA vs. ACIT, TDS CIRCLE, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 133/PAT/2010[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 Mar 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. Amit Shukla, Jm Ita No. 133/Pat./2010 : Asstt. Year : 2008-09 Syndicate Bank, Vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Fraser Road, Tds Circle, Patna-800001 Patna (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Ptns01245G Assessee By : Sh. A. K. Sarkar & Sh. Abhi Sarkar, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Abhay Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 08.03.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 08.03.2018 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 05.04.2010 Of Ld. Cit(A), Dhanbad, Camp Office Patna.

For Appellant: Sh. A. K. Sarkar &For Respondent: Sh. Abhay Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)

TDS of Rs.11,59,881/-. It has been held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Cocacola Beverage Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT 163 Taxman 355 that there could be no recovery of taxes alleged to be in default once again from the deductor if the deductee had already paid taxes on the amount received. Therefore