SANJAY YADAV,JAHANABAD vs. NFAC, DELHI, DELHI
In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 218/PAT/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna11 Sept 2025AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra
Section 142(1)Section 147Section 234BSection 250Section 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)
TDS on rent is wrong, illegal and unjustified on the facts and circumstances of the appellant's case.
6. For that the Ld. CIT (A) NFAC has erred in affirming charging interest u/s 234B amounting to Rs.3,94,200/- which is bad in fact and law of the case.
7. For that the appellant may not be treated as assessee