BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 226(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi358Mumbai305Chennai199Karnataka168Bangalore134Kolkata95Raipur86Pune51Jaipur39Ahmedabad33Indore25Dehradun24Hyderabad23Jodhpur16Rajkot13Lucknow13Chandigarh13Surat6Guwahati6Panaji4Cuttack4Amritsar4Patna3Cochin3SC3Kerala3Nagpur2Telangana2Ranchi1Varanasi1Orissa1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 194H4Deduction3TDS3Section 402Section 201(1)2Section 194C2Disallowance2Limitation/Time-bar2

RAVI LOCHAN SINGH,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-5(1), PATNA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1/PAT/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Patna17 May 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 194HSection 40

226, wherein it has been propounded that in case a recipient has included the receipts from an assessee in its income, then in the hands of the payer, the deduction would not be disallowed under section 40(a)(ia) on the ground that TDS was not deducted. The assessee has filed evidence, copy of the return of Dr. Sitasaran Singh

RAVI LOCHAN SINGH,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-5(1), PATNA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2/PAT/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna17 May 2023AY 2013-14

Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Bench:
Section 194HSection 40

226, wherein it has been propounded that in case a recipient has included the receipts from an assessee in its income, then in the hands of the payer, the deduction would not be disallowed under section 40(a)(ia) on the ground that TDS was not deducted. The assessee has filed evidence, copy of the return of Dr. Sitasaran Singh

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PATNA,PATNA vs. ACIT, TDS CIRCLE, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 107/PAT/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna19 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A), It Is Seen That 5 Notices Of Hearing Were Given But The Same Could Not Be Attended By The Assessee & Thereafter The Action Of Ld. Ao Was Upheld Through The Impugned Order.

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS Circle, Patna (here-in- after known as "the Ld. Assessing Officer") and confirmation of the same by the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Income Tax Department (here-in-after known as "the CIT (A)") are both bad on facts and in law inter-alia being based entirely on mere suspicion, surmises and conjectures. 3. For that