BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

17 results for “TDS”+ Section 201(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,585Delhi1,545Bangalore1,107Chennai652Kolkata465Karnataka256Pune173Jaipur164Raipur153Hyderabad144Nagpur142Ahmedabad141Indore105Cochin99Chandigarh62Surat54Jodhpur45Lucknow43Rajkot42Jabalpur39Panaji36Visakhapatnam29Telangana27Kerala26Dehradun24Cuttack24Agra18Amritsar17Patna17SC13Guwahati9Ranchi9Varanasi8Himachal Pradesh6Allahabad4Orissa3Rajasthan3J&K1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 194C26Section 201(1)23TDS15Section 25014Section 20113Deduction8Addition to Income7Section 106Natural Justice5Section 253(3)

ASHISH RANJAN,DARBHANGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DARBHANGA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 160/PAT/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Patna05 Jan 2026AY 2024-25
Section 143(1)Section 200

201 of the Act. However, in the present case\nthe employer is already under liquidation. Therefore, the said action\nwas also could not be taken against the employer. In our opinion, the\nnon-deposit of TDS on the part of the employer cannot be slapped on\nthe assessee more so no action against the employer can be taken\nunder

THE BRANCH MANAGER, SBI, SECRETARIAT BRANCH,PATNA vs. ACIT, TDS CIRCLE, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 13/PAT/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Patna23 Aug 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

4
Section 133A4
Section 153C4
Section 10Section 139Section 192Section 201

201(1) Where any person, including the principal officer of a company (a) Who is required to deduct any sum in accordance with the provisions of this Act; or (b) referred to in sub-section (1 A) of section 192, being an employer, does not deduct, or does not pay, or after so deducting fails to pay, the whole

THE BRANCH MANAGER, SBI, SECRETARIAT BRANCH,PATNA vs. ACIT, TDS CIRCLE, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 12/PAT/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Patna23 Aug 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 10Section 139Section 192Section 201

201(1) Where any person, including the principal officer of a company (a) Who is required to deduct any sum in accordance with the provisions of this Act; or (b) referred to in sub-section (1 A) of section 192, being an employer, does not deduct, or does not pay, or after so deducting fails to pay, the whole

THE BRANCH MANAGER, SBI, SECRETARIAT BRANCH,PATNA vs. ACIT, TDS CIRCLE, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 14/PAT/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna23 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 10Section 139Section 192Section 201

201(1) Where any person, including the principal officer of a company (a) Who is required to deduct any sum in accordance with the provisions of this Act; or (b) referred to in sub-section (1 A) of section 192, being an employer, does not deduct, or does not pay, or after so deducting fails to pay, the whole

SHIV SHANKAR SINGH CONTRACT PVT LTD,GOPALGANJ vs. ITO, TDS, MUZAFFAPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 91/PAT/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna14 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 133ASection 194CSection 250Section 253(3)

section 194C, and therefore such a payment required deduction of TDS while making such payment. However, since the assessee had failed to produce any evidence of deduction or explanation as to why the same is not deductible the AO has correctly held that the assessee is in default u/s 201(1)/1A of the I.T. Act. in respect of such

SHIV SHANKAR SINGH CONTRACT PVT LTD,GOPALGANJ vs. ITO, TDS, MUZAFFAPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 92/PAT/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna14 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 133ASection 194CSection 250Section 253(3)

section 194C, and therefore such a payment required deduction of TDS while making such payment. However, since the assessee had failed to produce any evidence of deduction or explanation as to why the same is not deductible the AO has correctly held that the assessee is in default u/s 201(1)/1A of the I.T. Act. in respect of such

SHIV SHANKAR SINGH CONTRACT PVT LTD,GOPALGANJ vs. ITO, TDS, MUZAFFAPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 94/PAT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna14 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 133ASection 194CSection 250Section 253(3)

section 194C, and therefore such a payment required deduction of TDS while making such payment. However, since the assessee had failed to produce any evidence of deduction or explanation as to why the same is not deductible the AO has correctly held that the assessee is in default u/s 201(1)/1A of the I.T. Act. in respect of such

SHIV SHANKAR SINGH CONTRACT PVT LTD,GOPALGANJ vs. ITO, TDS, MUZAFFAPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 93/PAT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna14 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 133ASection 194CSection 250Section 253(3)

section 194C, and therefore such a payment required deduction of TDS while making such payment. However, since the assessee had failed to produce any evidence of deduction or explanation as to why the same is not deductible the AO has correctly held that the assessee is in default u/s 201(1)/1A of the I.T. Act. in respect of such

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PATNA,PATNA vs. ACIT, TDS CIRCLE, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 107/PAT/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna19 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A), It Is Seen That 5 Notices Of Hearing Were Given But The Same Could Not Be Attended By The Assessee & Thereafter The Action Of Ld. Ao Was Upheld Through The Impugned Order.

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS Circle, Patna (here-in- after known as "the Ld. Assessing Officer") and confirmation of the same by the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Income Tax Department (here-in-after known as "the CIT (A)") are both bad on facts and in law inter-alia being based entirely on mere suspicion, surmises and conjectures. 3. For that

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA vs. BROADSON COMMODITIES PVT LTD, DHANBAD

In the result, both the appeals of Revenue are dismissed, whereas the Cross Objections filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 62/PAT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Aug 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 132Section 153Section 153C

TDS, TCS and self- assessment tax. Ground No. 10-General in nature. During the course of appellate proceedings appellant raised additional ground which is as under: - “That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Assessing officer erred in making an addition of Rs. 5,50,00,000/- on the basis of seized documents found in third party

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA vs. BROADSON COMMODITIES PVT LTD, DHANBAD

In the result, both the appeals of Revenue are dismissed, whereas the Cross Objections filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 63/PAT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Aug 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 132Section 153Section 153C

TDS, TCS and self- assessment tax. Ground No. 10-General in nature. During the course of appellate proceedings appellant raised additional ground which is as under: - “That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Assessing officer erred in making an addition of Rs. 5,50,00,000/- on the basis of seized documents found in third party

BIHAR STATE POWER GENERATION COMPANY LTD.,PATNA vs. ACIT-TDS CIRCLE, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 105/PAT/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna15 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 250

3. The sole issue involved in these appeals is as to whether the assessee is to be treated as assessee in default u/s. 201(1)/(1A) of the Act for not deducting tax at source (TDS) as per the provisions of section

BIHAR STATE POWER GENERATION COMPANY LTD.,PATNA vs. ACIT-TDS CIRCLE, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 106/PAT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna15 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 250

3. The sole issue involved in these appeals is as to whether the assessee is to be treated as assessee in default u/s. 201(1)/(1A) of the Act for not deducting tax at source (TDS) as per the provisions of section

BIHAR STATE POWER GENERATION COMPANY LTD.,PATNA vs. ACIT-TDS CIRCLE, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 102/PAT/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna15 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 250

3. The sole issue involved in these appeals is as to whether the assessee is to be treated as assessee in default u/s. 201(1)/(1A) of the Act for not deducting tax at source (TDS) as per the provisions of section

BIHAR STATE POWER GENERATION COMPANY LTD.,PATNA vs. ACIT-TDS CIRCLE, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 103/PAT/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna15 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 250

3. The sole issue involved in these appeals is as to whether the assessee is to be treated as assessee in default u/s. 201(1)/(1A) of the Act for not deducting tax at source (TDS) as per the provisions of section

BIHAR STATE POWER GENERATION COMPANY LTD.,PATNA vs. ACIT-TDS CIRCLE, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 104/PAT/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna15 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 250

3. The sole issue involved in these appeals is as to whether the assessee is to be treated as assessee in default u/s. 201(1)/(1A) of the Act for not deducting tax at source (TDS) as per the provisions of section

MOHAMMAD TANWEER ALI IMAM,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD- 5(1), PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 110/PAT/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna22 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm Mohammad Tanweer Ali Imam, Income Tax Officer, Darul Aman Po Bv College, Ward 5(1), Patna Samanpura, Rajabazar, Vs. Patna-800014 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aanpi1722J Assessee By : Shri Manish Rastogi, Ar Revenue By : Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, Dr Date Of Hearing: 08.07.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 22.07.2025

For Appellant: Shri Manish Rastogi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, DR
Section 144Section 144BSection 147Section 201(1)

TDS was deducted and deposited on the transfer of the said amount during the F.Y. 2015-16 and accordingly, the income of the assessee has escaped of ₹1,10,00,000/- within the meaning of 147 of the act on account of failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts. Finally, the assessment