BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 194Hclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai357Delhi305Kolkata108Bangalore107Chennai83Indore39Jaipur28Karnataka27Pune17Rajkot17Hyderabad16Ahmedabad14Chandigarh13Amritsar6Surat6Raipur5Patna5Lucknow4Telangana4Visakhapatnam3Calcutta3Guwahati3Nagpur3SC3Cochin2Kerala2Jodhpur2Ranchi1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 407Section 194H6Section 2504TDS4Disallowance4Section 194C3Addition to Income3Limitation/Time-bar3Deduction3Section 142(1)

GUPTA JI BROTHERS RICE PRIVATE LIMITED,DALMIA NAGAR vs. DCIT CIRCLE-3, GAYA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 33/PAT/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna13 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 194CSection 194HSection 250Section 37(1)Section 40

TDS was under Section 194C of the Act (work) or section 194H (commissioner or brokerage) of the Act. 3. We have

RAVI LOCHAN SINGH,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-5(1), PATNA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

2
Section 1482
ITA 1/PAT/2021[2012-13]Status: Disposed
ITAT Patna
17 May 2023
AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 194HSection 40

TDS under section 194H of the Income Tax Act. The assessee has submitted that as far as payment of Rs.3

RAVI LOCHAN SINGH,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-5(1), PATNA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2/PAT/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna17 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 194HSection 40

TDS under section 194H of the Income Tax Act. The assessee has submitted that as far as payment of Rs.3

RAVI LOCHAN SINGH,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-5, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 124/PAT/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 Jan 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 250Section 32Section 32(1)

194H of the Income Tax Act, 1961, section 40(a)(ia) is attracted here also. Hence, It is my opinion that the assessee has claimed Rs. 9,05,981/- under the head of commission but he has not deducted TDS

MD IFTAKHAR ALAM,ARARIA vs. ITO, PURNEA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 389/PAT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna09 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 194HSection 250Section 69A

TDS is being deducted u/s 194H of the Income Tax Act 1961 further an accumulated commission of Rs.76,569 only has been received by assessee during the financial year 2016-17 relevant to it's AY 2017-18. 7. For that on the facts and circumstances of the case the deposits made during the period of demonetization