BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

189 results for “TDS”+ Section 16clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi3,684Mumbai3,649Bangalore1,941Chennai1,372Kolkata885Pune713Ahmedabad710Hyderabad693Indore553Jaipur437Chandigarh367Cochin340Raipur296Karnataka260Visakhapatnam233Nagpur232Surat227Patna189Cuttack168Rajkot145Lucknow106Jabalpur85Amritsar80Dehradun68Jodhpur52Panaji51Ranchi50Agra48Guwahati46Telangana37Allahabad33SC18Varanasi13Calcutta11Kerala11Rajasthan6Himachal Pradesh6J&K5Punjab & Haryana3Uttarakhand3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1Orissa1

Key Topics

TDS97Section 153C4Section 1534Addition to Income3Section 1322

DEEPAK SHRAWAN BUDHIA,MUMBAI vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF I.T., PATNA-1, PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 365/PAT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna19 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI SONJOY SARMA (Judicial Member)

Section 147Section 263Section 40

section 40(a)(ia) of the Act the AO has not disallowed the certain payments made towards freight charges are covered under the TDS provision , the TDS default is made by the assessee in respect of payment/credit given to resident on 30% of such expenditure should have been disallowed in the hands of the tax payer

ACIT, PATNA vs. CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,

In the result, the appeals of the department as well as the Cross

ITA 29/PAT/2015[2011-12]Status: Disposed

Showing 1–20 of 189 · Page 1 of 10

...
ITAT Patna
07 Mar 2018
AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. Amit Shukla, Jm Ita No. 28/Pat./2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 29/Pat./2015 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Vs M/S Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Tax, Circle-1, Tapeshwar Bhawan, Mangal Pandey Patna Path, Ara, Bhojpur (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabtc0114A

For Appellant: Sh. A. K. Rastogi & Sh. Rakesh KumarFor Respondent: Sh. Kaushik Kumar Das, Sr. DR
Section 194H

section 194H will not be applicable, hence the disallowance made by the 4 ITA Nos. 28 & 29/Pat./2015 CO Nos. 2 & 3/Del/2015 Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd. AO for non-deduction of TDS u/s 194H in respect of commission amount of Rs.45,65,546/- is not sustainable and hence deleted.” 7. Now the department is in appeal

ACIT vs. M/S CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,

In the result, the appeals of the department as well as the Cross

ITA 28/PAT/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Patna07 Mar 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. Amit Shukla, Jm Ita No. 28/Pat./2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 29/Pat./2015 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Vs M/S Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Tax, Circle-1, Tapeshwar Bhawan, Mangal Pandey Patna Path, Ara, Bhojpur (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabtc0114A

For Appellant: Sh. A. K. Rastogi & Sh. Rakesh KumarFor Respondent: Sh. Kaushik Kumar Das, Sr. DR
Section 194H

section 194H will not be applicable, hence the disallowance made by the 4 ITA Nos. 28 & 29/Pat./2015 CO Nos. 2 & 3/Del/2015 Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd. AO for non-deduction of TDS u/s 194H in respect of commission amount of Rs.45,65,546/- is not sustainable and hence deleted.” 7. Now the department is in appeal

PIONEER EDUCATION SOCIETY,HARYANA vs. ITO, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 405/PAT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthii.T.A. No. 405/Pat/2024 Assessment Year: 2016-2017 Pioneer Education Society,……….…….....……Appellant C-310/311, Unitech Business Zone Nirvana Country, South City-Ii, Sector-50, Haryana, Pin Code No.122018 [Pan:Aadap0174C] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,……………………………….Respondent Ward-1(1), Patna, Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Bhawan, New Dak Bunglow, Patna-800001, Bihar Appearances By: Shri Yatin Sharma, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Rinku Singh, Cit (Dr), Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: April 21, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: April 24, 2025 O R D E R

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 68

16 ledger. But no details of salary paid in respect of all three schools, viz. names of the teaching and non-teaching staff, gross salary paid, mode of payment, TDS thereon etc. Therefore, 50% of the salary and wages, comes to Rs.64,03,650/- was treated by the ld. Assessing Officer as unexplained money and added to the total income

I.T.O. vs. M/S KUMAR CONSTRUCLTION,

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 10/PAT/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Patna17 Oct 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 40A(3)

TDS on such payment, therefore, these payments are not to be allowed as a deduction to the assessee under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. He further submitted that effort at the end of the assessee was to frustrate the ld. Assessing Officer for conducting proper inquiries in its accounts. The assessee kept on changing the stand

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA vs. BROADSON COMMODITIES PVT LTD, DHANBAD

In the result, both the appeals of Revenue are dismissed, whereas the Cross Objections filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 62/PAT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Aug 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 132Section 153Section 153C

TDS, TCS and self- assessment tax. Ground No. 10-General in nature. During the course of appellate proceedings appellant raised additional ground which is as under: - “That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Assessing officer erred in making an addition of Rs. 5,50,00,000/- on the basis of seized documents found in third party

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA vs. BROADSON COMMODITIES PVT LTD, DHANBAD

In the result, both the appeals of Revenue are dismissed, whereas the Cross Objections filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 63/PAT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Aug 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 132Section 153Section 153C

TDS, TCS and self- assessment tax. Ground No. 10-General in nature. During the course of appellate proceedings appellant raised additional ground which is as under: - “That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Assessing officer erred in making an addition of Rs. 5,50,00,000/- on the basis of seized documents found in third party

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-1, PATNA, PATNA vs. NORTH BIHAR POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, PATNA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue and COs of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 234/PAT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna23 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vp & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Ankit Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Md. A. H. Chowdhary, CIT (DR)

section. Considering the same, the addition is deleted. Ground No. 8 is allowed.” 8.3. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the materials available on record. We note that the learned CIT (A) in his finding stated that the said amount represented the interest received on advance given to Bajaj Electrical Ltd. It was not a contractual receipt

NALANDA ENGICON PVT. LTD, PATNA,PATNA vs. PR. CIT CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 326/PAT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

16. For that on the fact and in circumstances of the case the Pr. CIT has erred in stating the order of the ld. AO as "erroneous in so far as it was prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue" is arbitrary and bad in law. 17. For that on the fact and in circumstances of the case the setting

NALANDA ENGICON PVT. LTD, PATNA,PATNA vs. PR. CIT CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 325/PAT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

16. For that on the fact and in circumstances of the case the Pr. CIT has erred in stating the order of the ld. AO as "erroneous in so far as it was prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue" is arbitrary and bad in law. 17. For that on the fact and in circumstances of the case the setting

NALANDA ENGICON PVT. LTD, PATNA,PATNA vs. PR. CIT CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 329/PAT/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

16. For that on the fact and in circumstances of the case the Pr. CIT has erred in stating the order of the ld. AO as "erroneous in so far as it was prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue" is arbitrary and bad in law. 17. For that on the fact and in circumstances of the case the setting

NALANDA ENGICON PVT. LTD, PATNA,PATNA vs. PR. CIT CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 327/PAT/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

16. For that on the fact and in circumstances of the case the Pr. CIT has erred in stating the order of the ld. AO as "erroneous in so far as it was prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue" is arbitrary and bad in law. 17. For that on the fact and in circumstances of the case the setting

NALANDA ENGICON PVT. LTD, PATNA,PATNA vs. PR. CIT (CENTRAL), PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 322/PAT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

16. For that on the fact and in circumstances of the case the Pr. CIT has erred in stating the order of the ld. AO as "erroneous in so far as it was prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue" is arbitrary and bad in law. 17. For that on the fact and in circumstances of the case the setting

NALANDA ENGICON PVT. LTD, PATNA,PATNA vs. PR. CIT CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 323/PAT/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

16. For that on the fact and in circumstances of the case the Pr. CIT has erred in stating the order of the ld. AO as "erroneous in so far as it was prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue" is arbitrary and bad in law. 17. For that on the fact and in circumstances of the case the setting

NALANDA ENGICON PVT. LTD, PATNA,PATNA vs. PR. CIT CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 328/PAT/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

16. For that on the fact and in circumstances of the case the Pr. CIT has erred in stating the order of the ld. AO as "erroneous in so far as it was prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue" is arbitrary and bad in law. 17. For that on the fact and in circumstances of the case the setting

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,BARE BHABUA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 196/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,BARE BHABUA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 195/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,UPHARA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 314/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,BARE BHABUA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 194/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,BARE BHABUA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 193/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly