BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

473 results for “TDS”+ Section 154(7)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi949Mumbai773Patna473Bangalore407Cochin315Pune283Chennai273Kolkata179Indore179Hyderabad119Karnataka118Ahmedabad114Chandigarh85Jaipur83Raipur82Nagpur52Visakhapatnam49Lucknow36Surat36Dehradun30Jabalpur28Rajkot28Agra14Amritsar13Telangana10Jodhpur10Guwahati8Allahabad5Panaji5Cuttack5SC4Varanasi4Himachal Pradesh2J&K1Kerala1Punjab & Haryana1Calcutta1Ranchi1

Key Topics

TDS100

AJAY KUMAR GHOSH,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1/PAT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna09 Oct 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 40A(3)

TDS not deducted on it. Hence, the same is required to be added back to total income of the assessee”. 4. The ld. Assessing Officer has observed that the assessee did not appear in response to the show-cause notice and accordingly he passed the rectification order. He made an addition of both these amounts to the total income

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,UPHARA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 313/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: Disposed

Showing 1–20 of 473 · Page 1 of 24

...
ITAT Patna
30 Jan 2023
AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,BASDIHA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 297/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,MURADABAD BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 267/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,PUSAULI STATION BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 281/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,PARARIYA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 312/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DUMRAON BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 192/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DARIGAON BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 246/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,KOCHAS BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 260/PAT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,MANGRAON BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 261/PAT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,AKBARPUR BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 238/PAT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,PUSAULI STATION BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 280/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,PARARIYA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 310/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,PARARIYA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 311/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DARIGAON BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 247/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DUMRAON BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 191/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,RAMGARH BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 237/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,BARE BHABUA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 193/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DURGADIH BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 258/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,PUSAULI STATION BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 279/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 200A for computation of fee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it is noticed that the appellant-assessee, in these appeals, has not challenged the original orders passed u/s 200A of the Act, which in the lead case (ITA No. 34/Pat/2022) is dated 17.04.2015. Admittedly