BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Short Term Capital Gainsclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,732Delhi1,174Bangalore494Kolkata404Ahmedabad381Chennai338Jaipur238Hyderabad184Pune136Indore131Chandigarh123Surat81Cochin71Calcutta54Rajkot44Karnataka41Nagpur39Visakhapatnam38Cuttack37Raipur32Guwahati27SC27Lucknow24Telangana20Amritsar15Ranchi11Agra8Patna7Jabalpur7Kerala7Varanasi5Rajasthan4Jodhpur4Panaji2Allahabad2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Orissa1Dehradun1Punjab & Haryana1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 2636Section 143(3)3

VIJESH VITHAL TALAULICAR,PANAJI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 1(1), PANAJI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 230/PAN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji31 Mar 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battullआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 230/Pan/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Shri Vijesh Vithal Talaulicar Shri Ramnath Sadan, Dr. Dada Vaidya Road, Panaji, Goa Pan : Aaxpt9647D .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Panaji. ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri D.E. Robinson, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

short ‘the Act’) dated 28.02.2013 for assessment year 2010-11. Before us the assessee has assailed the impugned order on the following grounds of appeal: “1. On facts and circumstances of the case on record the impugned order of the CIT(A) is not sustainable on facts and law. 2. The learned CIT(A) erred in holding that the Assessing

GUALA CLOSURES (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,PANAJI vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI., SELECT CITY

Appeal is dismissed in above terms

ITA 205/PAN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Ketan VedFor Respondent: Shri P.S. Shivshankar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144(3)Section 144CSection 253Section 263Section 4

short term benefit. Several case laws have been cited by the assessee in support of its contention that the assessee is paying royalty for right to use the patent or trademark in the normal course of its business. It goes without saying that the distinction between capital and revenue expenditure must be decided on a case to case basis