Search: transfer pricing

3 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 43Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai161 Delhi101 Bangalore25 Chennai25 Ahmedabad24 Kolkata22 Visakhapatnam19 Hyderabad18 Raipur18 Jaipur8 Pune8 Lucknow5 Panaji3 Cuttack2 Surat2 Cochin1 Patna1 Jodhpur1 Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 43B21 Disallowance3 Addition to Income3

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANAJI vs. M/S SALITHO ORES PVT. LTD, PANAJI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 100/PAN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji21 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury(Through Virtual Hearing) M/S. Salitho Ores Pvt. Ltd., Vs Acit, Circle-1, Salgaocar Bhavan, Altinho, Margao Panaji, Goa. Pan: Aabcs 8859 F Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwalla, CAFor Respondent: Shri Prabhakar Anand DJ, DR

Section 43B

43B, the law laid down specifically by the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of West Bengal v. Kesoram Industries Ltd. [2004] 266 ITR 721 (SC) is that royalty is not tax. Further, the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT v. Kutch Minerals [2008] 03 DTR 11 M/s.Salitho Ores

M/S SALITHO ORES PRIVATE LIMITED,PANAJI vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - M1, MARGAO

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed