Search: transfer pricing

6 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 35(1)(iv)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 43B21 Section 92C6 Section 2636 Addition to Income6 Section 143(3)4 Disallowance3 Transfer Pricing3 Deduction3 Section 92A2

SCORPIO IRON LTD,PANAJI vs. ITO, WARD - 1(4), PANAJI

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 388/PAN/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji07 Oct 2021AY 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Shrinivas Nayak, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 92ASection 92C

IV. Proposed Condition: Under taking shall provide all infrastructure facility for common use such as roads, water supply and sewerage, generation and distribution of power, air conditioning etc. Actual: The company was providing all these facilities at the IT Park which are verifiable from the balance sheet & profit & loss account of the company. V. Proposed Condition: Minimum number of industrial

SHREE AMBEY FORGING PRIVAT LIMITED,PANAJI vs. ITO, WARD - (4), PANAJI

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

SCORPIO IRON LTD,PANAJI vs. ITO, WARD - 1(4), PANAJI

SHREE AMBEY FORGING PRIVAT LIMITED,PANAJI vs. ITO, WARD - (4), PANAJI

SCORPIO IRON LTD,PANAJI vs. ITO, WARD - 1(4), PANAJI

SHREE AMBEY FORGING PRIVAT LIMITED,PANAJI vs. ITO, WARD - (4), PANAJI

GUALA CLOSURES (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,PANAJI vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI., SELECT CITY

M/S SALITHO ORES PRIVATE LIMITED,PANAJI vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - M1, MARGAO

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANAJI vs. M/S SALITHO ORES PVT. LTD, PANAJI

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANAJI vs. M/S SALITHO ORES PVT. LTD, PANAJI