Search: transfer pricing

7 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 10(37)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 43B21 Section 2636 Section 92C6 Addition to Income6 Section 143(3)4 Transfer Pricing3 Deduction3 Disallowance3 Section 43(5)2

SHREE AMBEY FORGING PRIVAT LIMITED,PANAJI vs. ITO, WARD - (4), PANAJI

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 389/PAN/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji07 Oct 2021AY 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Shrinivas Nayak, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 92ASection 92C

10) The Id. AO-TP has erred in considering the departmental guidelines regarding no requirement of ascertaining the arm's length price in present case as there is no income tax benefit availed by the assesse nor their associate concerns. 11) The Id. AO(TP) and Dispute Resolution Panel-2, Bangalore, has erred in rejecting the Comparable Uncontrolled Price method

SCORPIO IRON LTD,PANAJI vs. ITO, WARD - 1(4), PANAJI

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

SHREE AMBEY FORGING PRIVAT LIMITED,PANAJI vs. ITO, WARD - (4), PANAJI

SCORPIO IRON LTD,PANAJI vs. ITO, WARD - 1(4), PANAJI

SHREE AMBEY FORGING PRIVAT LIMITED,PANAJI vs. ITO, WARD - (4), PANAJI

SCORPIO IRON LTD,PANAJI vs. ITO, WARD - 1(4), PANAJI

GUALA CLOSURES (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,PANAJI vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI., SELECT CITY

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANAJI vs. M/S SALITHO ORES PVT. LTD, PANAJI

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANAJI vs. M/S SALITHO ORES PVT. LTD, PANAJI

M/S SALITHO ORES PRIVATE LIMITED,PANAJI vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - M1, MARGAO

BEIERSDORF INDIA (P) LTD.,PANAJI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(4),, PANAJI