BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Long Term Capital Gainsclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,674Delhi1,198Bangalore440Chennai402Kolkata396Ahmedabad313Jaipur237Hyderabad177Pune129Cochin121Indore121Chandigarh86Surat77Calcutta55Cuttack45Nagpur44Rajkot43Lucknow35Visakhapatnam31Raipur29Guwahati27Telangana25Karnataka25SC18Amritsar15Agra14Jodhpur8Patna7Allahabad6Varanasi5Jabalpur4Ranchi4Dehradun2Rajasthan2Panaji2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Orissa1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 2636Section 143(3)3

VIJESH VITHAL TALAULICAR,PANAJI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 1(1), PANAJI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 230/PAN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji31 Mar 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battullआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 230/Pan/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Shri Vijesh Vithal Talaulicar Shri Ramnath Sadan, Dr. Dada Vaidya Road, Panaji, Goa Pan : Aaxpt9647D .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Panaji. ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri D.E. Robinson, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

long term capital gain is claimed on the transaction. 5.6 The Assessing Officer has held the sale of iron ore waste is derived from mining activity and is therefore a business asset. He has pointed out that ore rejects is iron ore with low iron or few content and during the relevant year the ore rejects had demand in foreign

GUALA CLOSURES (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,PANAJI vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI., SELECT CITY

Appeal is dismissed in above terms

ITA 205/PAN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Ketan VedFor Respondent: Shri P.S. Shivshankar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144(3)Section 144CSection 253Section 263Section 4

long term benefits, and were required to be treated as a capital expenditure. The AO had allowed deduction of this expenditure without inquiring into the claim. 3. Accordingly, a notice dated 22.02.2019 was issued to the assessee proposing to pass an appropriate order u/s 263 of the Act, since the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was erroneous