BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “section 68”+ Section 90clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi3,078Mumbai2,756Bangalore846Chennai716Kolkata684Ahmedabad623Karnataka594Jaipur504Hyderabad501Indore304Cochin289Pune248Chandigarh224Surat210Raipur168Visakhapatnam102Lucknow92Nagpur88Cuttack87Rajkot81Telangana72Calcutta63Amritsar57Ranchi53SC40Jodhpur40Allahabad38Guwahati34Agra34Patna19Jabalpur18Dehradun13Rajasthan10Panaji9Varanasi9Orissa6Gauhati1Kerala1Uttarakhand1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(a)18Section 143(3)11Deduction8Section 92C6Addition to Income6Exemption5Section 115B4Section 80P(2)(d)3Section 683Natural Justice

MR. MALLIKARJUN APPANNA ITI,GOKAK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, GOKAK

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 419/PAN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. A. S. Patil, Tax ConsultantFor Respondent: Sh. Manoj Joshi, CIT, DR
Section 115BSection 133ASection 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 263Section 68Section 69

90,287/- treated as Deemed Income U/ S 69- 69A is opposed to Law and there is no justification for taxing the Income @ 30% as per the Provisions of Section 115BBE instead oftaxing the same at normal rate of tax. 3] Learned Commissioner [Appeals] did not consider the Grounds of Appeal No.4. Learned Income-Tax Officer in Computing Income

3
Section 14A2
Section 41(1)2

KWALITY ANIMAL FEEDS PRIVATE LIMITED,BELGAUM vs. ACIT CIRCLE 1 BELGAUM, BELGAUM

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 217/PAN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji25 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A. Nos. 217/Pan/2023 (A.Y. 2017-18) Kwality Animal Feeds Pvt Ltd, Vs Acit-Circle 1, 12, Kwality House, Civil Hospital Road, . Machhe Industrial Area, Belagavi-590001. Machhe, Karnataka. Belgaum-590014, Karnataka. Pan .No. Aabck0589J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

Section 68

section 68 of the Act made by the Assessing Officer. 2. The brief facts of the case are that, the assesse company is engaged in the business of manufacturing of poultry/animal feeds and running poultry farms. The 2 ITA. No..217/PAN/2023 Kwality Animal Feeds Pvt Ltd. assessee has filed the return of income on 27-10-2017 disclosing

SALGAOCAR MINING INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED.,PANAJI vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MARGAO RANGE., MARGAO

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 118/PAN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji05 Oct 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sukhsagar SyalFor Respondent: Shri Prabhakar Anand
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 41(1)

90,714/-. Similarly, during the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer had called for the details of the provisions for expenses debited to Profit & Loss Account which remains unpaid as on 31.03.2011. The details of such provisions are set out by the Assessing Officer vide para 6 of the assessment order. The Assessing Officer inferred that since the expenses

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, MARGAO., MARGAO vs. M/S SALGAONCAR MINING INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., PANAJI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 135/PAN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji05 Oct 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sukhsagar SyalFor Respondent: Shri Prabhakar Anand
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 41(1)

90,714/-. Similarly, during the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer had called for the details of the provisions for expenses debited to Profit & Loss Account which remains unpaid as on 31.03.2011. The details of such provisions are set out by the Assessing Officer vide para 6 of the assessment order. The Assessing Officer inferred that since the expenses

SCORPIO IRON LTD,PANAJI vs. ITO, WARD - 1(4), PANAJI

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 388/PAN/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji07 Oct 2021AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Shrinivas Nayak, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 92ASection 92C

68,545/- based on the order of the AO-TP u/s 92CA of the Income Tax Act'1961, in spite of the fact that the assesse or their AE has not taken any benefit or exemption / deduction under the Income Tax Act. The Id AO(TP) and Dispute Resolution Panel-2, Bangalore, 4) has willfully ignored that the assesee

SHREE AMBEY FORGING PRIVAT LIMITED,PANAJI vs. ITO, WARD - (4), PANAJI

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 389/PAN/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji07 Oct 2021AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Shrinivas Nayak, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 92ASection 92C

68,545/- based on the order of the AO-TP u/s 92CA of the Income Tax Act'1961, in spite of the fact that the assesse or their AE has not taken any benefit or exemption / deduction under the Income Tax Act. The Id AO(TP) and Dispute Resolution Panel-2, Bangalore, 4) has willfully ignored that the assesee

M/S RAVIKIRAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,BELAGAVI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , HUBLI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 94/PAN/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji08 Sept 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhurysl.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Prabhakar Anand DJ
Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

90,520/-. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Belgaum (‘the Assessing Officer’) vide order dated 28.11.2019 passed u/s 143(3) of the Act at a total income of Rs.11,50,472/-. While doing so, the Assessing Officer had denied the exemption u/s 80P(2)(a)(i)/80P

M/S RAVIKIRAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,BELAGAVI vs. NATIONAL E - ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 93/PAN/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji08 Sept 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhurysl.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Prabhakar Anand DJ
Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

90,520/-. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Belgaum (‘the Assessing Officer’) vide order dated 28.11.2019 passed u/s 143(3) of the Act at a total income of Rs.11,50,472/-. While doing so, the Assessing Officer had denied the exemption u/s 80P(2)(a)(i)/80P

M/S RAVIKIRAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,BELAGAVI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3, BELAGAVI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 92/PAN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji08 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhurysl.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Prabhakar Anand DJ
Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

90,520/-. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Belgaum (‘the Assessing Officer’) vide order dated 28.11.2019 passed u/s 143(3) of the Act at a total income of Rs.11,50,472/-. While doing so, the Assessing Officer had denied the exemption u/s 80P(2)(a)(i)/80P