BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ House Propertyclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,954Mumbai1,843Bangalore661Karnataka566Jaipur416Ahmedabad370Chennai352Hyderabad252Kolkata245Surat211Chandigarh202Pune186Indore164Cochin123Visakhapatnam106Raipur85Telangana75Rajkot65Nagpur59Calcutta54Amritsar54Lucknow53Cuttack37SC33Guwahati32Agra27Jodhpur24Patna21Allahabad10Kerala7Rajasthan7Varanasi7Ranchi5Orissa3Jabalpur3Dehradun2Panaji2Punjab & Haryana2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)2Addition to Income2

EMGEE HOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED,GOA vs. JCIT(A), KANPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 273/PAN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji17 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A. Nos. 273/Pan/2024 (A.Y. 2017-18 ) Emgee Housing Private Vs Acit-Circle 1(1), Limited, Aaykar Bhavan, . 608, City Center Patto Plaza, Edc Complex, Panjim-403001, Patto Plaza, Goa. Panjim-403001, Goa. Pan .No.Aabce6688E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) Assessee By None(Letter 10-03-25) Revenue By Ms.Nazeera Mohamad.Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 11.03.2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 17.03.2025 Order Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Appeal Is Filed By The Assesse Against The Order Of The Addl/ Jcit(A) Kanpur Passed U/Sec 143(3) & U/Sec 250 Of The Act. 2. At The Time Of Hearing, It Was Found That There Is A Delay In Filing The Appeal Before The Hon’Ble Tribunal & The Assesse Has Filed An Affidavit For Condonation Of Delay. Whereas, The Facts Mentioned In The Affidavit Are Reasonable & Sufficient Cause Was Explained & The Ld. Dr Has No Specific Objections. Accordingly, We Condone The Delay & Admit The Appeal. The Assessee Has Raised

Section 23

Housing Private Limited. the grounds of appeal challenging the additions u/sec22 and u/sec37(1) of the Act sustained by the CIT(A). 3. The brief facts of the case are that, the assessee company is engaged in the business of property developers. The assessee has filed the return of income for the A.Y 2017-18 on 31.10.2017 disclosing a total

DEVASHRI NIRMAN LLP ,PANAJI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), PANAJI

In the result, this appeal by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 272/PAN/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji17 Dec 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya, Am & Shri Ram Lal Negi, Jm

For Respondent: Shri Y. V. Raviraj
Section 271(1)(c)

House, Campal, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Panjai, Goa Patto, Panaji, Goa PAN/GIR No. AABFD 2012 N (Appellant) : (Respondent) : Shri M. C. Maniwadekar Appellant by Respondent by : Shri Y. V. Raviraj Date of Hearing : 15.11.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 17.12.2018 O R D E R Per Shamim Yahya, A. M.: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the learned