BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Set Off of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,139Delhi767Chennai505Jaipur284Ahmedabad254Kolkata226Hyderabad190Bangalore166Pune123Chandigarh120Raipur116Rajkot101Indore81Patna64Nagpur63Guwahati51Visakhapatnam47Surat41Jodhpur38Lucknow30Cuttack28Amritsar28Agra25Ranchi22Cochin22Allahabad18Dehradun18Panaji3Jabalpur2Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 115J8Section 2636Section 143(3)6Addition to Income3Section 1472Deduction2Reassessment2

BARDC BANK,BHATKAL vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee is allowed

ITA 294/PAN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji19 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A. Nos.294/Pan/2024 (A.Y. 2013-14) Bardc Bank Bhatkal, Vs National E – Pld Bank, Main Road, Assessment Centre . Uttara Kannada, Delhi-110001 Bhatkal S.O. Karnataka-581320. Pan .No. Aaaap1731G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147

set of information which was available on record in the original assessment and no material was available to make reassessment. It is only a mere change of opinion based on the subsequent judicial decision, were the assessment was 4 ITA. No. 294/PAN/2024 BARDC Bank. concluded on 19-12-2015.The Ld. AR demonstrated the issue of notice u/sec 148 of the Act served

GUALA CLOSURES (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,PANAJI vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI., SELECT CITY

Appeal is dismissed in above terms

ITA 205/PAN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Ketan VedFor Respondent: Shri P.S. Shivshankar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144(3)Section 144CSection 253Section 263Section 4

loss returned which is prejudicial to the interest of such assessee. (2) On receipt of the draft order, the eligible assessee shall, within thirty days of the receipt by him of the draft order,- (b) file his acceptance of the variations to the Assessing Officer; or (b) file his objections, if any, to such variation with,- (i) the Dispute Resolution

M/S TERECOM (P) LTD.,GOA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2 (1), PANAJI., PANAJI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 63/PAN/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji06 Oct 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Prabhakar Anand
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 148

Loss Account was not added back to the book profits for the purpose of computing the tax u/s 115JB of the Act. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer vide order dated 29.01.2015 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act after making addition on account of provisions for bad and doubtful