SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, KARWAR
Appeals are DISMISSED
ITA 267/PAN/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2009-10
Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali
For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)
271(1) of the Act were already passed and demands raised thereagainst were not only communicated but pending for payment. None of these findings were pull to pieces by the appellant.
ITAT-Panaji Page 14 of 22
Neha Prasanna Ghotage Vs ACIT, Belgaum
ITA No. 259 to 268/PAN/2025 AY: 2006-07 to 2010-11
19. In view of the aforestated
