BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

18 results for “reassessment”+ Section 27(2)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,224Mumbai2,124Bangalore818Chennai747Jaipur453Ahmedabad389Kolkata349Hyderabad316Chandigarh174Indore169Surat126Raipur114Pune113Rajkot109Cochin89Visakhapatnam87Karnataka69Patna66Lucknow64Cuttack63Amritsar56Telangana46Nagpur46Agra44Guwahati42Allahabad42Dehradun28Ranchi25SC24Panaji18Orissa11Jodhpur11Calcutta6Rajasthan4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Jabalpur1Uttarakhand1Varanasi1J&K1

Key Topics

Section 24940Section 14432Section 246A20Section 25014Section 15514Condonation of Delay11Section 253(1)10Section 271(1)(c)10Section 143(1)10Penalty

MARIA ESTIBEIRO,PANAJI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 1(1), PANAJI

The appeal stands ALLOWED

ITA 34/PAN/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji24 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliassessment Year : 2012-13 Maria Estibeiro L/H Of Jacintodas Estibeiro 781, St. Marys Colony, Miramar, Goa. Pan:Aabpe2798N . . . . . . . Appellant V/S Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji, Goa. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : Mr D E Robinson [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Vimalraj Periyagounden [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 25/03/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 24/04/2025 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali, Am; By This Appeal Captioned Appellant Impugns Din & Order No. 1060336601(1) Dt. 31/01/2024 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [‘The Act’] By The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’] Which In Turn Arisen Out Of Order Of Assessment Passed U/S 147 R.W.S. 144 Of The Act For Assessment Year 2012- 13 [‘Ay’].

For Appellant: Mr D E Robinson [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Vimalraj Periyagounden [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 56(2)
10
Limitation/Time-bar10
Addition to Income7

reassessment order; High Court observes that legal heirs received the notice under section 142(1) but no fresh valid notice u/s 148 was issued to them; High Court further observes that the notice to the deceased Assessee is invalid from its inception as ITAT-Panaji Page 19 of 28 Maria Estibeiro L/H of Jacintodas Estibeiro Vs DCIT, Panaji

GUALA CLOSURES (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,PANAJI vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI., SELECT CITY

Appeal is dismissed in above terms

ITA 205/PAN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji13 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Ketan VedFor Respondent: Shri P.S. Shivshankar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144(3)Section 144CSection 253Section 263Section 4

d) report, if any, of the Assessing Officer, Valuation Officer or Transfer Pricing Officer or any other authority; (e) records relating to the draft order; (f) evidence collected by, or caused to be collected by, it; and (g) result of any enquiry made by, or caused to be made by, it. 17 ITA.No.205/PAN./2019 (7) The Dispute Resolution Panel

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, KARWAR

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 264/PAN/2025[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 259 to 268/PAN/2025 Assessment Years: 2006-07 to 2010-11 Neha Prasanna Ghotage No. 1088, Preana Homes, Ranade Colony, Hindwadi, Belgaum-590011 PAN: AJKPG5121B. . . . . . . . Appellant V/s Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Belgaum. . . . . . . . Respondent Represented Assessee by: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’] Revenue by: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’] Date of conclusive

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2, BELAGAVI

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 262/PAN/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 259 to 268/PAN/2025 Assessment Years: 2006-07 to 2010-11 Neha Prasanna Ghotage No. 1088, Preana Homes, Ranade Colony, Hindwadi, Belgaum-590011 PAN: AJKPG5121B. . . . . . . . Appellant V/s Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Belgaum. . . . . . . . Respondent Represented Assessee by: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’] Revenue by: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’] Date of conclusive

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2, BELAGAVI

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 261/PAN/2025[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2008-09

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 259 to 268/PAN/2025 Assessment Years: 2006-07 to 2010-11 Neha Prasanna Ghotage No. 1088, Preana Homes, Ranade Colony, Hindwadi, Belgaum-590011 PAN: AJKPG5121B. . . . . . . . Appellant V/s Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Belgaum. . . . . . . . Respondent Represented Assessee by: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’] Revenue by: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’] Date of conclusive

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2, BELAGAVI

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 260/PAN/2025[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2007-08

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 259 to 268/PAN/2025 Assessment Years: 2006-07 to 2010-11 Neha Prasanna Ghotage No. 1088, Preana Homes, Ranade Colony, Hindwadi, Belgaum-590011 PAN: AJKPG5121B. . . . . . . . Appellant V/s Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Belgaum. . . . . . . . Respondent Represented Assessee by: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’] Revenue by: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’] Date of conclusive

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, 2, BELAGAVI

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 259/PAN/2025[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 259 to 268/PAN/2025 Assessment Years: 2006-07 to 2010-11 Neha Prasanna Ghotage No. 1088, Preana Homes, Ranade Colony, Hindwadi, Belgaum-590011 PAN: AJKPG5121B. . . . . . . . Appellant V/s Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Belgaum. . . . . . . . Respondent Represented Assessee by: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’] Revenue by: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’] Date of conclusive

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, KARWAR

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 267/PAN/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 259 to 268/PAN/2025 Assessment Years: 2006-07 to 2010-11 Neha Prasanna Ghotage No. 1088, Preana Homes, Ranade Colony, Hindwadi, Belgaum-590011 PAN: AJKPG5121B. . . . . . . . Appellant V/s Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Belgaum. . . . . . . . Respondent Represented Assessee by: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’] Revenue by: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’] Date of conclusive

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, KARWAR

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 266/PAN/2025[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2008-09

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 259 to 268/PAN/2025 Assessment Years: 2006-07 to 2010-11 Neha Prasanna Ghotage No. 1088, Preana Homes, Ranade Colony, Hindwadi, Belgaum-590011 PAN: AJKPG5121B. . . . . . . . Appellant V/s Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Belgaum. . . . . . . . Respondent Represented Assessee by: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’] Revenue by: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’] Date of conclusive

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, KARWAR

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 265/PAN/2025[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2007-08

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 259 to 268/PAN/2025 Assessment Years: 2006-07 to 2010-11 Neha Prasanna Ghotage No. 1088, Preana Homes, Ranade Colony, Hindwadi, Belgaum-590011 PAN: AJKPG5121B. . . . . . . . Appellant V/s Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Belgaum. . . . . . . . Respondent Represented Assessee by: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’] Revenue by: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’] Date of conclusive

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, KARWAR

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 268/PAN/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 259 to 268/PAN/2025 Assessment Years: 2006-07 to 2010-11 Neha Prasanna Ghotage No. 1088, Preana Homes, Ranade Colony, Hindwadi, Belgaum-590011 PAN: AJKPG5121B. . . . . . . . Appellant V/s Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Belgaum. . . . . . . . Respondent Represented Assessee by: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’] Revenue by: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’] Date of conclusive

SMT NEHA PRASANNA GHOTAGE,BELAGAVI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2, BELAGAVI

Appeals are DISMISSED

ITA 263/PAN/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji11 Feb 2026AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 144Section 246ASection 249Section 250Section 253(1)Section 271(1)(c)

D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 259 to 268/PAN/2025 Assessment Years: 2006-07 to 2010-11 Neha Prasanna Ghotage No. 1088, Preana Homes, Ranade Colony, Hindwadi, Belgaum-590011 PAN: AJKPG5121B. . . . . . . . Appellant V/s Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Belgaum. . . . . . . . Respondent Represented Assessee by: Mr Pramod Vaidya [‘Ld. AR’] Revenue by: Mr Azhar Zain [‘Ld. DR’] Date of conclusive

M/S CHOWGULE AND COMPANY (SALT) PVT. LTD,MORMUGAO vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 2, MARGAO

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in terms of aforesaid observation

ITA 390/PAN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji29 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D. Battullआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. : 390/Pan/2017 करधििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013 M/S Chowgule & Company (Salt) Pvt Ltd., Chowgule House, Mormugao Harbour, Goa – 403803. Pan: Aabcc 5595 J . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बिाम / V/S Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Margao, Goa. . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Ms Hiral Sejpal Revenue By : Shri Sourabh Nayak सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 24/02/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 29/04/2022 आदेश / Order Per Jamlappa D Battull Am; The Present Appeal Filed By The Appellant Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax- Appeals, Panaji-1 [For Short “Cit(A)”] Dt. 09/10/2017 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which In Turn Tousled Out Of Order Of Assessment Of Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-Circle-2, Margoa [For Short “Ao”] Dt. 27/07/2014 Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Act, For The Assessment Year [For Short “Ay”] 2012-2013. Itat-Panaji Page 1 Of 23

For Appellant: Ms Hiral SejpalFor Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak
Section 10(35)Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 14A(1)Section 250

reassess under section 147 or pass an order enhancing the assessment or reducing a refund already made or otherwise increasing the liability of the assessee under section 154, ITAT-Panaji Page 13 of 23 M/s Chowgule and Company (Salt) Pvt Ltd ITA No.: 390/PAN/2017, AY : 2012-2013, AABCC5595J for any assessment year beginning on or before

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANAJI, PANAJI, GOA vs. BAGKIYA CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD, GOA

The appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed in aforestated terms

ITA 148/PAN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliassessment Years: 2017-2018 Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle, Panaji, Goa. . . . . . . . Appellant V/S M/S Bagkiya Construction Pvt. Ltd. Sf-3, Building No.-3. Techno Cidade, Chogam Rd., Alto Porvorim, Goa-403521. Pan: Aaccb9382M . . . . . . . Respondent Represented Assessee By: None For The Respondent Revenue By: Mr Senthil Kumar [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 29/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 27/02/2026 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali; This Revenue’S Appeal Filed U/S 253(2) Of The Income- Tax Act, 1961 [‘The Act’] Challenges The Order Dt. 29/05/2023 Passed U/S 250 Of The Act By Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals-2), Panaji [‘Ld. Cit(A)’] Which In Turn Wheeled From The Order Dt. 25/08/2021 Passed U/S 147 Of The Act By Acit, Central Circle, Panaji, Goa [‘Ld. Ao’] Anent To Assessment Year 2017-18.[‘Ay’]

For Appellant: None for theFor Respondent: Mr Senthil Kumar [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 127(2)Section 131Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 253(2)

D. PADMAHSHALI; This Revenue’s appeal filed u/s 253(2) of the Income- tax Act, 1961 [‘the Act’] challenges the order dt. 29/05/2023 passed u/s 250 of the Act by Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals-2), Panaji [‘Ld. CIT(A)’] which in turn wheeled from the order dt. 25/08/2021 passed u/s 147 of the Act by ACIT, Central Circle, Panaji

JENNY ELTON VALES,DONA PAULA vs. ITO, WARD - 5, MARGAO

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA No

ITA 65/PAN/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji30 Jan 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri D. E. RobinsonFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 155Section 5A

27-02-2020 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Panaji [‘CIT(A)’] for assessment years 2007-08 and 2009-10. A.Ys.2007-08 & 2009-10 2. Since, the issues raised in both the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts, I proceed to hear both the appeals together and to pass a consolidated order

JENNY ELTON VALES,DONA PAULA vs. ITO, WARD - 5, MARGAO

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA No

ITA 64/PAN/2020[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji30 Jan 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri D. E. RobinsonFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 155Section 5A

27-02-2020 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Panaji [‘CIT(A)’] for assessment years 2007-08 and 2009-10. A.Ys.2007-08 & 2009-10 2. Since, the issues raised in both the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts, I proceed to hear both the appeals together and to pass a consolidated order

BARDC BANK ,BHATKAL vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 295/PAN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji14 Aug 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliassessment Year : 2014-15 Bardc Bank Bhatkal Next To Bsnl Tower, Bhatkal, Uttara Kannada. Pan:Aaaap1731G . . . . . . . Appellant

For Appellant: Mr Ravish Rao [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Ms Rijjula Uniyal [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80P

D. PADMAHSHALI, AM; Instant appeal is filed by the assessee against the DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1070120969(1) dt. 05/11/2024 passed u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [for short ‘the Act’] by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [for short ‘NFAC’] which in turn has ascended out of order of assessment passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B

M/S SANKAMTAL HOTEL PRIVATE LTD.,BELAGAVI vs. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE - 2 (1), BELAGAVI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 191/PAN/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji30 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2008-09 M/S Sankamtal Hotel Acit, Circle-1, Pvt. Ltd. Belagavi S. Parthasarathi, Advocate, 3/1, Pranava Vs. Complex, 5Th Cross, Malleswaram, Bangalore- 560 003. Pan: Aadcs 5106 P (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : Smt. Pratibha R., Advocate Respondent By : Shri Mayur Kamble, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 14.06.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 30.08.2022 O R D E R Per Girish Agrawal: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Arising Out Of The Order Of Ld. Cit(A), -Belagavi In Ita No.51/Bgm/2016-17 Dated 25.02.2018 Against The Assessment Order Passed By Acit, Circle-2(1), Belagavi U/S 143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’) Dated 14.03.2016 For A.Y. 2008-09. 2. There Is A Delay Of Five Days In Filing The Present Appeal For Which The Petition For Condonation Of Delay & Affidavit Are Placed On Record. From The Affidavit, We Note That The Assessee Was Out Of Station When The Appeal Memo Was Sent To Him By The Counsel For Its Signature & Therefore A Short Delay Of 5 Days Occurred. Considering The Petition & In The Interest Of Justice & Fair Play, We Find It Proper To Admit The Appeal & Proceed To Adjudicate Thereon.

For Appellant: Smt. Pratibha R., AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Mayur Kamble, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 31

D E R PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the order of Ld. CIT(A), -Belagavi in ITA No.51/BGM/2016-17 dated 25.02.2018 against the assessment order passed by ACIT, Circle-2(1), Belagavi u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) dated